• Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I’m just pointing out the wording there. I’m not at all saying comey didn’t botch it, but on its face we WANT prosecutors to ignore both sides and focus on what the facts.

    I was trying to say its a crazy bonkers world when judicial isnt expected to ignore political parties.

    Sorry for the confusion, i am not talker good

    • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      And, like I just said but you ignored, he did not pay used to both sides. He ignored the one and attacked the other.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        Dude, what is it that you arent understanding here.

        I quoted and am talking about one specific sentence YOU said. That taken on its own, are mind blowing words, even if only in isolation.

        “His crime was resisting political pressure from both sides”

        That sentence on its own, taken as is, is bonkers crazy to think that we would ever want judicial to bow to political pressure when it is prosecuting someone.

        Normally, that is exactly what we hope happens in a judicial setting, isn’t it?

        So if we are in a place where YOU claim it was a crime, that is absolutely wild and mind blowing to be experiencing that situation.

        Thats it man, thats all im saying.

        Im not arguing about what comey actually did or didnt do, im commenting on the situation as YOU presented it.