• FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Reminds me of Tesla. Trying to do something stylish and ending up with an impractical flop.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Apple still puts form over function - even the current magic mouse is more of a tabletop decoration than a functional input device. They just learned how to get away with it.

        • espentan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Overheard in the UX department at work: “… yeah, but I can’t right now, my mouse is charging”.

        • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes. But don’t worry the next one will probably be Qi charger only so the mouse becomes unusable for longer won’t have filty ports spoiling it’s aesthetics.

      • espentan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I remember in the CD/DVD-ROM days, when you had to boot up the OS to eject the tray, because Apple didn’t want any buttons on the case.

        I’ve had a disdain for that company, and Jobs, for more than 30 years, ever since I read how the latter forced the engineers mount capacitors on the flip side of the motherboard, because he felt they looked ugly when peering inside the cabinet. The result was increased complexity and overheating issues.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Apple didn’t want any buttons on the case.

          They had a legitimate argument in the floppy era, I think.

          The Windows PC had a mechanical eject button on floppy drives, which the OS had no control over. You could corrupt a filesystem by deciding to eject a disk at the wrong time, if the OS decided to start writing to the floppy then. To this day, that’s how 3.5" floppy drives work on Windows PCs.

          Apple said — in my view, correctly — "okay, this is a disaster’. They built their computers without an eject button on the floppy drive. Their floppy drives had a motor to let the OS eject the disk, You had to ask the OS to eject a disk, and the OS would only do so when it knew that it wasn’t going to be writing to the disk. They had a pinhole through which you could push a mechanical eject button if something went wrong with the OS. That was a good call, I think. It did mean that unless you were going to use the pinhole, the drive had to be at least powered.

          By the optical disc era, though, the Windows side of things had fixed things up. What you had was a system where drives had a non-mechanical eject button. The drive had two states that it could be in — the OS could ask the drive to be in a “locked” or “unlocked” state. In an “unlocked” state, the button would activate the motor to do the ejection. In a “locked” state, it wouldn’t, but the OS would receive a message from the drive, and as long as it was functioning, could unmount the thing and eject the CD.

          • espentan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Good write up.

            I might be misremembering this, but I think the external drive I had for my Amiga 500 had hardware lockout, i.e. one couldn’t eject a disk while the drive was working. I recall it as the button being locked/couldn’t be pressed. If I’m not just remembering wrong, it would mean there were options to hinder erroneous disk ejects beyond removing the button.

    • toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      can you imagine a CyberMouse? sharp edges, stops working during random updates, relies on satellite tech instead of rf for no defendable reason, recalled because they just glued the buttons on and they might get stuck, and everyone hates you when they see it?