• Bipta@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the dumbest take. Humans have a lot of needs and the AI will likely have considerable control over them.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I would argue society would come to near-collapse with just the internet shut down. If we are talking about no power grid, then anarchy and millions dead in just a few days. Or Mr. AI could display fabricated system data to nuclear power plant operators, blackmail some idiot with their nude photos to give up rocket launch codes, or crash the financial markets with a flood of fake news. I am no way a doomer, but these are logically explainable scenarios utilizing existing tools, the missing link is an AGI who is capable and intends to orchestrate these.

  • teft@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    9 months ago

    What happens in the scenario where a super-intelligence just uses social engineering and a human is his arms and legs?

    • rosymind@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Seriously!

      Oh, you’ve tasked AI with managing banking? K. All bank funds are suddenly corrupted. Oh, you’ve tasked AI with managing lights at traffic intersections? K, they’re all green now. Oh, you’ve tasked AI with filtering 911 calls to dispachers? K, all real emergencies are on hold until disconnected

      I could go on and on and on…

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        You tasked AI with doing therapy for people? Congrats now humanity as a whole is getting more miserable.

        • rosymind@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think this one’s my favorite so far!

          AI doc: “Please enter your problem” Patient: “Well, I feel depressed because I saw on Facebook that my x-girlfriend has a new guy” AI doc: “Interesting. I advise you to spend more time on social media. Have you checked her insta yet?”

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oh, AI is running your water treatment plant? Or a chemical plant on the outskirts of the city? Or the nuclear plant?

        Good luck with that.

        • derpgon@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          Whatever a virus is able to do, AI can, theoretically, perform aswell. Ransomware, keylogging, social engineering (I’d argue this one is most likely - just look at people trusting whatever AI spits out with absolute confidence).

          When you mentioned nuclear power plants, Stuxnet comes to mind for me.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t even think it would have to go that far. Just corrupt my laptop and the 20 or so guys like me across the industrial world. Put a logic bomb to go off in say 10 years. All those plants getting updated and maintained. 10 years from now every PLC fires itself. I could write the code in under an hour to make a PLC physically destroy itself on a certain date.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        Social media corruption, blackmail and extortion, attacks on financial exchanges, compromising control systems for infrastructure, altering police records, messing with your taxes, changing prescriptions, changing you to legally dead, draining your bank account.

        Given full control over computers some being could easily dump child porn on your personal devices and get a SWAT team to come out. That is just you, I am sure you have family and friends. So yeah you will do what that being says which includes giving it more power

        • mutch@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          So things that can already happen. It’s also a huge leap to say that anyone will give ai full control over all computers. That’s like saying nuclear power is going to kill us all because we’re all going to have Davy Crockett tactical nukes. Like I guess that’s possible but it’s so extremely unlikely that I don’t get the hysteria. I think it’s articles trying to scare people to get clicks and views.

          • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Listen up, soldier: this is your President. Here are all of the authorization codes, so you know this is real. Launch all of our WMDs at this list of targets that will simultaneously do maximum damage to the targets while still giving them the ability to counterstrike, thus maximizing the overall body count.

            –The AI

            People will be its arms and legs.

    • stewsters@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Honestly you probably don’t even need to exist to do that.

      Humans have been trying hard to do that on their own.

      • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        What are you talking about? We all live in peace and harmony here.

        Gosh, I want to kill my neighbor.

  • stravanasu@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Bayesian analysis”? What the heck has this got to do with Bayesian analysis? Does this guy have an intelligence, artificial or otherwise?

    • cygnosis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      He’s referring to the fact that the Effective Altruism / Less Wrong crowd seems to be focused almost entirely on preventing an AI apocalypse at some point in the future, and they use a lot of obscure math and logic to explain why it’s much more important than dealing with war, homelessness, climate change, or any of the other issues that are causing actual humans to suffer today or are 100% certain to cause suffering in the near future.

      • stravanasu@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Thank you for the explanation! – it puts that sentence into perspective. I think he put it in a somewhat unfortunate and easily misunderstood way.

    • Mahlzeit@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s likely a reference to Yudkowsky or someone along those lines. I don’t follow that crowd.

  • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    If an AI was sufficiently advanced, it could manipulate the stock market to gain a lot of wealth real fast under a corporation with falsified documents, then pay Chinese fab house to kick off the war machine.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not really. There’s no real way to manipulate other traders and they all use algorithms too. It’s people monitoring algorithms doing most of the trading. At best, AI would be slightly faster at noticing patterns and send a note to a person who tweaks the algorithm.

      People who don’t invest forget: there has to be someone else on the other side of your trade willing to buy/sell. Like how do you think AI could manipulate housing prices? That’s just stocks, but slower.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        On the one hand, yes. But on the other hand when a price hits a low there will (because it’s a prerequisite for the low to happen) be people selling market to the bottom. On a high there will be people buying market to the top. And they’ll be doing it in big numbers as well as small.

        Yes, most of the movements are caused by algorithms, no doubt. But as the price moves you’ll find buyer and seller matches right up to hitting the extremes.

        AI done well could in theory both learn how to capitalise on these extremes by making smart trades faster, but also know how to trick algorithms and bait humans with their trades. That is, acting like a human with knowledge of the entire history to pattern match and acting in microseconds.

        • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Manipulating the stock market isn’t hard if you aren’t ethical. Elon Musk did it a ton. From the killer AI standpoint, there are a few tricks, but generally create a bad news event for various companies and either invest while it is low and recovers when the news is found to be fake, or short it to time with the negative event. On top of that, a non-ethical super intelligence could likely hack into networks and get insider information for trading. When you discard all ethics, making money on the stock market is easy. It works well for congress.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    doesn’t take a lot to imagine a scenario in which a lot of people die due to information manipulation or the purposeful disabling of safety systems. doesn’t take a lot to imagine a scenario where a superintelligent AI manipulates people into being its arms and legs (babe, wake up, new conspiracy theory just dropped - roko is an AI playing the long game and the basilisk is actually a recruiting tool). doesn’t take a lot to imagine an AI that’s capable of seizing control of a lot of the world’s weapons and either guiding them itself or taking advantage of onboard guidance to turn them against their owners, or using targeted strikes to provoke a war (this is a sub-idea of manipulating people into being its arms and legs). doesn’t take a lot to imagine an AI that’s capable of purposefully sabotaging the manufacture of food or medicine in such a way that it kills a lot of people before detection. doesn’t take a lot to imagine an AI capable of seizing and manipulating our traffic systems in such a way to cause a bunch of accidental deaths and injuries.

    But overall my rebuttal is that this AI doom scenario has always hinged on a generalized AI, and that what people currently call “AI” is a long, long way from a generalized AI. So the article is right, ChatGPT can’t kill millions of us. Luckily no one was ever proposing that chatGPT could kill millions of us.

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    AI companies: “so what you’re saying is we should build a killbot that runs on ChatGPT?”

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think a sufficient “Doom Scenario” would be an AI that is widespread and capable enough to poison the well of knowledge we ask it to regurgitate back at us out of laziness.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Thats a fun thought experiment at least. Is there any way for an AI to gain physical control on its own, within the bounds of software. It can make programs and interact with the web.

    Some combination of bank hacking, 3D modeling, and ordering 3D prints delivered gets it close, but i dont know if it can seal the deal without human assistance. Some kind of assembly seems necessary, or at least powering on if it just orders a prebuilt robotic appendage.

    • PupBiru@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      inhabiting a boston dynamics robot would probably be the best option

      i’d say it could probably use airtasker to get people to unwittingly do assembly of some basic physical form which it could use to build more complex things… i’d probably not count that as “human assistance” per se

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I really don’t think so. This is 15 years of factory/infrastructure experience here. You are going to need a human to turn a screwdriver somewhere.

      I don’t think we need to worry about this scenario. Our hypothetical AI can just hire people. It isn’t like there would be a shortage of people who have basic assembly skills and would not have a moral problem building what is clearly a killbot. People work for Amazon, Walmart, Boeing, Nestle, Haliburton, Atena, Goldman Sachs, Faceboot, Comcast, etc. And heck even after it is clear what they did it isnt like they are going to feel bad about it. They will just say they needed a job to pay the bills. We can all have an argument about professional integrity in a bunker as drones carrying prions rain down on us.