• Prunebutt@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think the second post explains how their definition of “work” differs from yours.

    I think they define “work” as wage-labour.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Maybe, but then if you abolish wage-labour, you just have a different type of work needed to survive. Either you’re going off-grid and living all on your own, which would mean you don’t have a lot, but you’re truly independent - or you’re part of a society where you don’t get paid a wage, but instead receive certain living conditions similar to everyone else’s, and you’re expected to work to the best of your ability.

      Yes, working for a wage is unnatural. But then being part of a large society with super specialized roles is unnatural. We’ve been doing unnatural for thousands of years now.