Pope Francis called Monday for a universal ban on the “despicable” practice of surrogate motherhood, as he included the “commercialization” of pregnancy in an annual speech listing threats to global peace and human dignity.

In a foreign policy address to ambassadors accredited to the Holy See, Francis lamented that 2024 had dawned at a time in history in which peace is “increasingly threatened, weakened and in some part lost.”

Citing Russia’s war in Ukraine, the Israel-Hamas war, migration, climate crises and the “immoral” production of nuclear and conventional weapons, Francis delivered a lengthy laundry list of the ills afflicting humanity and the increasing violation of international humanitarian law that allows them.

But Francis also listed smaller-scale issues that he said were threats to peace and human dignity, including surrogacy. Francis said the life of the unborn child must be protected and not “suppressed or turned into an object of trafficking.”

  • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I am no religious expert, but going by what I remember from church, Jesus was sent here for all of us, so wouldn’t that make the Virgin Mary basically a surrogate?

    • Bonehead@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Technically, but remember that Mary didn’t consent or even know what was happening. Jesus was a rape baby…

      • GadolElohai@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        @Bonehead Luke 1:38 “'I am the Lord’s servant, Mary answered. ‘May your word to me be fulfilled.’ Then the angel left her.” / Luke 1:46-48 “And Mary said: “My soul glorifies the Lord and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior, for he has been mindful of the humble state of his servant. From now on all generations will call me blessed,”

        Does not sound like she didn’t know what was going on, or that she didn’t consent…

          • ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Mo and Aisha at 9 - makes me think fundie abrahamic religions don’t care as much about age of consent.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Luke rewrote Matthew and cleaned it up. Here is what Matt wrote

          This is how the birth of Jesus the Messiah came about[d]: His mother Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be pregnant through the Holy Spirit. 19 Because Joseph her husband was faithful to the law, and yet[e] did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly.

          Matthew chapter 1:18-19

          No consent given.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Jesus was sent here for all of us

      Sure let’s check the Bible

      He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.”

      Matthew 15:24

      The disciples came to him and asked, “Why do you speak to the people in parables?” He replied, “Because the knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them.

      Mark 13:10-11

      Uh oh. It seems like Jesus wasnt sent for everyone only for a small group of loyal followers from one ethnic group.