GemAlarm@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agoImportant Messagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square82linkfedilinkarrow-up1882arrow-down117
arrow-up1865arrow-down1imageImportant Messagelemmy.worldGemAlarm@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agomessage-square82linkfedilink
minus-squareSpeiser0@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 days agoLol, pidgin does only one instruction at a time.
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoIt’s only one pigeon. Some of us have multiple pigeons though.
minus-squareSpeiser0@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoYou don’t need multiple pigeons. There’s instruction level parallelism.
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoI wasn’t sure about how I could HypethTreadTM a pigeon, so avoided voiding my warranty.
minus-squareSpeiser0@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoThat’s just a form of SMT (simultaneous multi taubing). Modern CPUs (central pigeon units) process many instructions even within one thread, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instruction-level_parallelism.
Lol, pidgin does only one instruction at a time.
It’s only one pigeon.
Some of us have multiple pigeons though.
You don’t need multiple pigeons. There’s instruction level parallelism.
I wasn’t sure about how I could HypethTreadTM a pigeon, so avoided voiding my warranty.
That’s just a form of SMT (simultaneous multi taubing). Modern CPUs (central pigeon units) process many instructions even within one thread, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instruction-level_parallelism.