• mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    assuming the following is true, this is a new car I would actually buy

    • no LED headlights (they are dangerous and rude)

    • you can disable the fake engine noise and transmission behaviour

    • the touchscreen is minimal and crucial controls are not locked behind menus or on the touchscreen in the first place

    • there aren’t excessive privacy concerns or lockouts preventing user maintenance

    • Sunshine@piefed.caOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      For me one of biggest selling points is that the company is from a middle power. I don’t want Winnie The Pooh or Mango Mussolini getting a cut.

    • Noxy@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      no LED headlights (they are dangerous and rude)

      Can you explain why you think LED headlights are either of those?

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        they’re blinding, preventing oncoming people from being able to see. and because lowbeams are just as bright as highbeams, just aimed lower, even lowbeams blind people. drive anywhere in a hilly area and this becomes apparent.

        they’re also obscene to be blasting into pedestrian and cyclist eyes in low speed neighbourhoods with streetlights. like how would those drivers feel if I walked around with a 4000lumen flashlight pointed at their eyes as they drive.

        • Noxy@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          are you sure that the light source itself is the problem, though?

          with proper housing and aiming there’s nothing special about LED light compared to xenon or halogen that makes it any more blinding.

          the problem is automakers and wildly outdated regulation allowing automakers to make their shit as bright as they can legally maneuver around. not the specific type of light source.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            They do it because they get saftey ratings which are occupant based.

            You want the absolutely brightest, longest shining lights possible to light up as much of the road as possible, but that has consequences for others.

            Theyre probably bumping up against whatever high end limits are allowed before the saftey agencies cause a fuss.

            But while it might solve one problem fixing this issue, it will probably cause another, e.g more people will be overdriving their lights.

          • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            23 hours ago

            oh, they could absolutely make LEDs in an acceptable manner. but they don’t.

            there’s some more inherent difficulty with getting LEDs to be acceptable, as well. not to mention the way they’re built nowadays means they’re not easily replaceable.

            however, your comment about aiming is completely incorrect. aiming is irrelevant, because roads have curves and elevation changes and bumps. lights need to not be so dangerously blinding even if pointed straight at somebody’s face, because they will be pointed straight at somebody’s face for many non-negligible occurrences. I know this because it happens to me every fucking night I’m outside around cars.

            • Noxy@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              23 hours ago

              again your complaint has nothing to do with the light source. you’re (rightfully, I agree!) talking about brightness, nothing to do with how the photos are generated, just how many are being generated.

        • Noxy@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          as they should. but the source of the light isn’t the problem, it’s how the light is focused and directed and cut off, and that can be done just as effectively for LEDs as any other light source.

    • Burray_Mookchin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The last two points are very valid but I think the fake engine noise while driving is pretty important for safety, no? Personally, I cant drive and usually get around by bike or on foot where a car that’s totally silent can be dangerous if you don’t see it coming

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        so, I meant fake engine noise in the cabin, not external noise

        however, I’m also against that godawful sound that cars make at low speed. it’s infuriatingly disturbing. their tires make enough goddamn noise already. I understand the reason for it, and it accomplishes its job, and my opinion is that I hate it. I hate-stare at drivers whose vehicle is making that whirring noise whenever one is near me

      • bitchkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        In the US cars are supposed to emit a Pedestrian Warning System (PWS) at low speeds. This not a vroom-vroom. Cars make plenty of noise, even EV .