• Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Honestly, replacing the C* suite is what IA would be best for!

      As PEOPLE they cost an exorbitant amount of money and stock options for exactly ZERO actual physical work.

      A group of AI agents, one for each of the C* positions, seeded with business based logic trees and equipped with exactly as much ethics subroutines as the board would allow would do the board bidding for 1/100000 of the cost of a human ceo.

  • axh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Does anyone know what the graphs would look like if we removed the r&d cost?

    I wonder if it would be profitable once they stop spending like crazy on developing new models.

    • Buckshot@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      28 days ago

      Based on the recently leaked OpenAI figures, still not profitable but it’s much closer. They would have lost $1.7B rather than $20.9B

  • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    The idea is to get everybody dependent upon it and then jack the prices way up. Seems to be the standard MO these days.