• LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    Get ready for next 11 months of “BoTh SidEs aRE thE SaME” bullshit.

    If both sides are same, why not vote for pro-genocide corporate shill who is not a rapist, not a traitor, and not a criminal?

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Unfortunately the incumbent has a massive advantage. It’s rare for a party to switch to a different candidate when one of theirs already has the seat.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Please name the third party candidate that has a reasonable chance of beating both Trump and Biden.

        • eksb@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          This is the primary. This is when we should be able to vote for candidates who more closely align with our views. (Like being anti-genocide.)

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Primaries are when you vote for a candidate from a specific party. The person above me said to vote third party. You can’t do that in a primary. It was obvious they were talking about the general election.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          Both of the people you named commit genocide. Voting for them means you endorse genocide. I fail to see how percentages are relevant here.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            The vote is to elect a president. If you are not going to vote for someone who has a chance of winning, what is the point of voting at all?

            I will happily vote for a third party candidate that has a chance of winning. I have asked for a name many times and have yet to be given one.

            • eksb@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              I live in a state that is not even close to be competitive. Why should I not vote for the Green Party candidate?

                • eksb@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  In my state, the two major parties keep changing the rules to make it harder for other parties to get ballot access. If a party gets a certain number of votes in the general, they can keep their ballot access without needing to jump through a bunch of expensive hoops designed to keep them out. I vote to have more choice in future elections. Because that is all I can vote for.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Okay, that is, at least, a reasonable explanation of why to vote third party without having to name a candidate. You’re literally the first person who has done this even though I have asked people who tell me to vote third party for a name for months now.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              The Greens have a 99% chance of winning if everyone stops acting like Biden is holding a gun against their heads to prevent them from voting differently.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I see, so if something that is almost certainly not going to happen happens, a Green candidate who you have not named has a 99% chance of beating Trump.

                That’s not what I asked. I didn’t ask for special, very unlikely circumstances.

                Name the third party candidate who has a good chance of winning as things stand now. Just give me a name.

                • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Biden doesn’t have a good chance of beating Trump either lmao. I’d give him 20% max.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Your wild guess percentages based on zero evidence are not a name. You still have not given me a name. Who am I supposed to vote for if you won’t even give me a name?

              • PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                “candidate X would easily win if everybody voted for them”

                No shit, now who are they and how do you propose convincing people to vote for them?

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Low turnout and high degree of votes for independents tend to favor Republicans in USA, and you have heard of their project 2025 right? A program literally designed to be a clone of nazism

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            They are literally telling you what they want to do. They want a republican president above the law and make a permanent legislative and judicial majority which can’t be unseated through elections.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              If they wanted that they could have done it in 2020 when they controlled everything and Trump was president? We heard this story back then and aside from the looney parade on Jan 6, the Republicans did not try to keep him in power like some god ruler.

              • Natanael@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                They tried but couldn’t due to infighting, and because they didn’t have a plan because they didn’t expect to win. Now they have plans. See project 2025 to start with

                They absolutely tried to keep him in power, all the lawsuits and other shenanigans was all about trying to block transfer of power when he lost. They literally tried to rig the vote by damaging the postal service, because they knew democrats would rely more on voting by mail with the pandemic going on. They’re working on gerrymandering state maps to artificially give Republicans more winning districts, giving them a chance to win states where they lost the popular vote.