• davitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Okay, now I’m extremely confused. How is being aware of the Pareto principle and mentioning it in situations where it applies “political inaction”? And more to the point, how does referencing it in response to reports about game revenue distribution in any way related to a person’s willingness to donate to steamdb?

    • ルルㇲ@retrofed.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Because as of typing, both, !skg@lemmy.dbzer0.com & steamdb community have yet to accomplish their goals.
      Political inactions in correct game conservations, inactions in financially stabilizing a community project.

      I apologize if my language makes shortcuts in conclusions, I don’t want to be writing essays on how politically ignorance is the prime cause of gamers losing the political battles they set out incorrectly to achieve. It just gives me much dramatic irony to see history repeat itself. I take inspiration from Buddhists, and cope laughing.
      me for the past years

      • davitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Yeah, sure, gamers are politically ignorant and fail to achieve their goals.

        But what does any of this have to do with the Pareto principle?

        • ルルㇲ@retrofed.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          I just said how:

          But you can reapply it to amount people unaware steamdb even exists🤣. Just like you were unaware the pleading was made for months, 80% of the population didn’t know either. We are the 20% knowledgeable base.