That only makes sense if both you and the CIA genuinely want the same thing. That’s bonkers to even put into type. If the CIA genuinely wants to do something good, then you saying, “find someone else to help you,” does not stand in the way of that good being done. There is zero risk from an altruistic point of view, the perceived risk here is that you don’t get money. That’s so short-sighted.
And anyway, they don’t want the same thing as you. Reducing harm is not their mandate. You are taking something you care about, and you are giving it to the CIA for their unstated ends. Congratulations, you no longer have something you care about.
That only makes sense if both you and the CIA genuinely want the same thing. That’s bonkers to even put into type. If the CIA genuinely wants to do something good, then you saying, “find someone else to help you,” does not stand in the way of that good being done. There is zero risk from an altruistic point of view, the perceived risk here is that you don’t get money. That’s so short-sighted.
And anyway, they don’t want the same thing as you. Reducing harm is not their mandate. You are taking something you care about, and you are giving it to the CIA for their unstated ends. Congratulations, you no longer have something you care about.
OK, tell me what bad thing happened as a result of this particular case of CIA funding.