Liberals will lie to you and tell you to “just vote in the primary,” but in reality they simply don’t care about trans rights and do not believe there is ever a right time to challenge transphobic Democrats.

First primary: the transphobes hide their colors so you can’t vote against them.

First general election: the snakes reveal their colors, but you can’t vote against the traitors because “blue no matter who.” They tell you to just vote in the next primary.

Second primary: the same people who tell you now “save it for the primary” shift their tune to “we can’t give up an incumbent seat in a purple district!”

Trans people can see through these bad-faith lies. Yet of course, mansplaining trolls will be sure to breathlessly explain “lesser of two evil” math, as if that’s not an argument we haven’t heard a thousand times and already rejected due to its obvious flaws. There’s never a shortage of arrogant cis people who think they know more about trans issues than actual trans people.

Liberals want your votes, not your voices. Be a good little minority and sit down. Shut up. Support the party. You owe the party your support. The party owes you nothing.

EDIT: A few thoughts to address the comment in the thread here:

  1. You need to get past your team sports approach to politics. I am not advocating voting against Democrats in general. I’m advocating for not voting for the 1% of Democratic candidates that have chosen to become fascist collaborators and adopt Republican positions on trans rights. To trans people, the Democratic party going TERF is a greater danger than the Republican party winning a slim majority in the Senate. The nightmare scenario here is what happened with Labor. Labor has completely fallen to Nazi collaborators. The UK has regressed in trans rights to now be the most transphobic country in Western Europe, and that happened under the rule of a center-left government. The trans people of the UK would have been better off with another term of conservatives than the transphobic labor leaders they elected instead. We don’t need to elect more Fettermans who will turn around and vote against the party the first chance they get. So many people in this thread believe, “you have to vote for the Nazi collaborators, otherwise the Nazis will win!”

  2. On saving democracy: you are vastly underestimating how difficult that task is. You seem to imagine you can just write a bill that just says, “democracy saved,” and call it a day. Actually saving democracy is going to require stripping powers from the presidency and dismantling the post-9/11 security state. That requires Democratic leaders of moral strength and conviction. It will take leaders willing to look their constituents in the eye and tell them, “I am going to vote for this bill to dismantle ICE. Yes, that means that occasionally an illegal immigrant is going to murder someone. I’m going to vote for this bill to dismantle the NSA’s illegal programs. Yes, that means we may have more terrorist attacks than we would otherwise. It’s worth it to save our Republic.” Saving democracy requires leaders who are literally willing to vote to kill their fellow Americans. Every power you strip away results in a few more people dying. It’s inevitable. And these transphobe Democrats are fundamentally cowards with no inner moral center. They’ll follow any poll or vote for any policy they think will get them power. This kind of person is not capable of saving democracy. You can’t defeat Nazism by voting in Nazi collaborators, and it’s insane to pretend you can.

  3. Those arguing that trans rights are a minor or insignificant issue? Frankly, if you believe this, you deserve to have your right to vote taken away. If you’re not willing to protect the vulnerable among your community, you deserve whatever evil befalls you. Karma’s a bitch in that way. We can all go to Hell together if that’s the path you choose.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      it wasn’t counted for Trump.

      if she had won, you would be praising her as a visionary over Hilary or kamala. and if all the votes for Hillary has gone to get, she would have won.

      • forkDestroyer@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        if she had won, you would be praising her as a visionary over Hilary or kamala

        If she had won, it would have been a full term of getting obstructed by both the Democrats and Republicans, because her inexperienced party has 0 representation in the House and the Senate.

        Fairy tale land thinking she would make any difference as the President without first having green party reps in lower government.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        And if my aunt had wheels she’d be a bike.

        The green party is a spoiler, and always has been, that only exists to split the vote and let the republicans win. That’s literally how electoral politics works in fptp.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          there is no reason to believe people who voted for Greens would have voted for Democrats.

          Democrats don’t own all votes that don’t go to Republicans. they must earn them. vote splitting is a myth that serves the hegemony.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            there is no reason to believe people who voted for Greens would have voted for Democrats.

            You mean aside from the constant drum beat that we should all vote for Joke Stein to send a message to the Democrats every 4 years?

            vote splitting is a myth that serves the hegemony.

            Yeah, that’s what people who don’t understand electoral politics and constantly push spoilers always tell me. Too bad I have a functioning brain that understands math.

            There are only two parties that have a snowballs chance in hell of winning, but keep pretending like letting the Republicans win won’t hurt us all much more. Vote for whomever you want, but stop lying to yourself.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              if democrats want people to vote for them, they need to earn that with policies that make people want to vote for them

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Them standing behind PoC and gender/sexual minorites at all is a good reason to vote for them, given the alternative wants to hurt those groups.

                Too bad perfect is the enemy of good, so let’s keep the republicans in power.

                  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    no one is saying that.

                    Maybe not explicitly, but there are tons of people advocating voting for 3rd parties that have no chance of winning or even staying home. And in fptp electoral politics, advocating against the party closest to you is implicitly arguing to help the one farthest from you.

                    So yeah, people are saying it, whether or not you want to acknowledge it.

      • CedricWhaley@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Thankfully most of us weren’t dumb enough to vote for that Russian stooge.

        Funny how you suggest that the tens of millions of Clinton voters are the ones who should change their votes rather than the ~1.5 million who voted for the fourth place finisher.