• Taasz/Woof@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yes, typing randomly isn’t actually as random as it could be, so a generator will do a better job.

      However mashing the keyboard is absolutely better than literally just “4” lol

      • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Generators aren’t intrinsically random either, the project that’s closest to random is the lava light room at cloud flare. But a wall of lamalamps aren’t random enough, so they add in a few parameters from the moon.

        But ultimately, it’s not truly random.

        Most generators are magnitudes simpler than that and honestly mashing everything at random yourself does a pretty good job at it. Especially if you smash too many characters and then scrambles it before picking a sequence without thought. As the biggest issue with manual button smashing, is the same character either won’t appear twice in a row ever or will always appear multiple in a row. Not to talk about special letters, which you likely wouldn’t hit - although we could make larger keyboards for the lulz

        Ultimately random generators is just a simpler/faster solution, but there’s ways of doing something as randomly by hand

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        first, what if i have my cat do it. second, why does it matter if a string is maximally random? is there a certain level that is random enough?

        • balsoft@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Those are all technically words in some dictionary somewhere, arranged in a sensible grammatical order. The entropy is not as high as you may think

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          9 hours ago

          This is why Hot Topic girlies are not in charge of crypto standards. They’re “OMG so random”, but not mathematically so random.

    • biggeoff@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Aside from humans being terrible random number generators, not as such.

      It’s better to seed a CSPRNG with a source of entropy though. E.g. there are tools that let you enter the result of many dice rolls and use it to generate a key.