• GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      They’ll never have a chance in a winner-take-all electoral college system.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      You’ll never convince 160 million people to vote 3rd party. So a vote for 3rd party is a vote for the most popular of the 2 candidates.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Ελληνικά
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        No, a vote 3rd party is a vote against your most tolerable of the two viable candidates.

      • pedalmore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The key here is that it’s a vote for the most popular of the 2 candidates based on the votes of who bothered to vote for them specifically, then further butchered via the EC. It’s a smaller, different pool of people that may elect someone that the actual majority prefer less, because part of the actual majority decided to play a different game entirely.