For what purpose??? Solar power makes the most sense on the moon. No atmosphere.
For what purpose??? Solar power makes the most sense on the moon. No atmosphere.
Hot water + degreaser. Soak overnight. Rinse.
He’s trying to do Blue Steel. Or maybe El Tigre.
Welp. If they claimed that, then Trump wore one during the debate.
Pizzas are just open-faced sandwiches. Anything you can put in a sandwich, you can put on a pizza.
Can Trump even get it up?
How could they run a space station without a lifeboat (Spare re-entry capsule)? This is a major oversight and should be corrected. Or are they waiting for the Titanic moment first?
Simply run the debate but with Kamala talking to a Trump cardboard cut out.
The victim can and probably sue them in the civil courts for damages.
Do eeeitttt. Russia is already invaded by Ukraine with no direct participation of NATO. Let’s see how they do against actual NATO planes, tanks, ships and soldiers.
You imply that there is some sort of Solar Empire enforcing this. What will happen is the colonies will eventually come up with their own calendars and time system that reflects their own planet’s rotation, seasons and diurnal cycle. This is the human way and is inevitable.
Tomatoes are South American. Ban tomatoes in Monfalcone.
It might replace the dumb AI we see in strategy games. You know, the one that suddenly nukes your cities after signing a peace treaty.
Very rich (hah) for a guy who uses government funds to build his explodey space rockets.
Horses were saved by cars too. Before ICE cars, horses were treated like shit and worked to death.
Not in the acceptable common format.
Nanni (1750 B.C.E.) [1] found that the quality of copper ingots from Dilmun specifically acquired and delivered by merchant Ea-nāṣir of Mesopotamia was substandard and thus not acceptable for trade [2,3,4,5,6,7,8].
Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, shame on glue.
How about NASA establish a Life Boat division first for the ISS? It’s mind boggling that there is no standby escape vehicle on the ISS to abandon ship. No, just because it is highly experimental doesn’t mean NASA can ignore hundreds of years of best practices.