AFAIK they would get the info “which user said what”. The source would be what ever instance you are from tho, not your own ip. So the owner of a instance knows as much as everyone else.
AFAIK they would get the info “which user said what”. The source would be what ever instance you are from tho, not your own ip. So the owner of a instance knows as much as everyone else.
I always thought that people hired to pen test are white hat hackers? What is the difference to red team?
I think they meant your info being sold on dark web markets, not your behaviour on the dark web being sold.
No, they just put it as background music in their videos, but didn’t actually pay for it. I would guess it constitutes fair use?
I am not sure as well, but maybe they meant “maybe an early and public disclosure increases the urgency of the fix for the developers”?
BMW did it: Video link
“Elementary, my dear watson” is a sherlock holmes “quote”, which is sometimes used to roughly say “it is actually quite simple”. Take away the “my dear” and the post roughly sounds like the “quote”.
There is a “y” in “my” so maybe “Sphinx” would complete the sentence?
Ah wow, I didn’t know that, thanks!
How would you derive that someone “dislikes jews because they are jews”? Do you listen to them talk and make a decision following your gut? Do you make an MRI image of their brain and measure their brain waves to read their mind?
You would have to work with their past actions. And then it becomes non trivial to define “anti-semite”.
So it is not really about “what does the word mean” but “how do you decide who fits the definition and who doesn’t”. People are concerned about this because it is very hard to make a law that 100% only fits to the people you want to target (leaving asside wether the principle is correct or not).
They are asking which way the minister wants to define the term.
Yes, but the point is that, afaik, that is not a crime, no?
More specifically: “4 people died from covid” is also true