

Or just skip them completly just list per 100g/100ml. The only reason to have serving size is to fudge the numbers.


Or just skip them completly just list per 100g/100ml. The only reason to have serving size is to fudge the numbers.


Just run unstable, especially on desktop. It is just unstable in name. Debian’s unstable is probably 100x more stable than some other distros stable line.


Just go unstable (sid). Do not let the name scare you, been running it for decades. Debian unstable is a lot more stable than other distros main line.
Every now and then a package might be broken, usually due to missing dependencies. But it is fixed within hours usually.
And no comments, unless you use a non-standard parser. But then you might as well use anorher format.


Yes, you have to pick your battles. Save it for when it is really needed.


Andersson - Swedish
I would say it is a tie between Andersson and Svensson.


Especially annoying since colons are already used to specify port number. Sure you can put it all inside [], but that just makes it even uglier.
Testing doesn’t get security updates as quickly as unstable, or even stable sometimes.
For desktop I run debian sid (unstable), despite the name it very rarely breaks. And once in a blue moon when it does it gets fixed in a few hours/a day. Usually it is just some package that doesn’t play nicely with something else, so not like it is unusable during that time.
The unstable part is that they do not guarantee that it will work, it is still more stable than most other distros and you get new packages.
I have always wondered about the “assorted” part in Bob’s business, it makes the joke funnier. But is he selling the rodents by weight? You just scoop up how many you want? Or is it some kind of mystery/loot box?


It hasn’t been viable to mine Bitcoin on GPU for about a decade, it is all CPU. I mean you can still obviously do it, but it isn’t worth it. You would get better results mining something else and swapping.
Different coins have different best suited hardware. Some by design, some by lack of design.


IANAL, but I believe in some places you have to go after any and all forms of it, otherwise you risk losing the whole thing. I think US is one of those places.
My guess: it is a low hanging fruit and then they can say “Look! We blocked X million bots! So you can trust the users that are left… please don’t look into it any more”


There are lots of companies selling data, just one of them is a list of known VPN IP addresses. Updated every X days. Just plug that into your service and it gets a lot harder, but still not impossible, to use with a VPN.


It will just be a few approved sites that you are allowed to visit, and just by chance those sites are the ones that pay the goverment the most! Those sites will have records in the approved DNS, that you can not change. Other DNS requests are blocked, along with everything else that isn’t approved.


Ah, but corporate profit margins are much more important than people


It is also possible that microsoft will disallow it in the future. Even they realise what a huge attack vector it is.
Big doubt on >50%, probably more like 0.5%
Exactly, and you have to remember what the context of the game theory were, picking up women in crowded bars. What works there, and on the subset of both men and women that goes to those places, will not always work in other settings with other people.