The catarrhine who invented a perpetual motion machine, by dreaming at night and devouring its own dreams through the day.
Well, at least here we can talk about Voldemort without evoking him, right? (Unless this shit is like Betelgeuse - on the third time you mention his name, he pops up to ruin your day.)
Okay, serious now: that’s sensible since in r/brasil it would be basically advertisement.
We’re talking about two different problems.
The one that I’m talking about is Reddit admins being clearly hostile towards the community, including mods, and the mods still being willing to lick the admins’ boots, instead of migrating their comms to another site. Even at the expense of the userbases of the subreddits that they moderate.
Here in Lemmy this shit does not roll - both because it’s easier to migrate comms across instances, and because the userbase is mostly composed of people with low tolerance towards admin abuse.
Now, regarding the problem that you’ve spotted: yes, it is a problem here that boils down to
I am really not sure on how to compare the extent of both issues in Lemmy vs. Reddit, nor how to address them here, and thus to get rid of the problem that you’re noticing.
For a casual observer, who was never engaged with that platform, it might actually look like Reddit is back to normal, based on a casual glance at the activity.
You only notice the cracks leaking water when you actually look closer, and you remember that the stone dam didn’t have so many of them. The surge on bot activity, the lower level of discourse in the comments, the further concentration of activity into larger subs, the content feeling more and more repetitive…
That’s hilarious. And surprisingly uplifting if the alt-right sub in question is r/brasillivre, since that shithole is still empty.
May I be blunt? I don’t think that anyone still moderating Reddit has a shred of dignity, decency, or concern about their userbase. As such this shit will pass and nobody there will care.
Just to be clear I’ll define two things:
This is important here because, even if your complain is worded as Lemmy being less intelligent, you’re clearly complaining about lack of knowledge - cue to “I always learn new stuff” and references to the complexity of registration (i.e. the knowledge necessary to navigate through it).
With that out of way:
Lemmy’s knowledge is mostly impaired by a small userbase. It’s great when it comes to a few topics, such as technology or specific lines of political thinking; but once you go past that it’s hard to find a lot of stuff here. This is not does not mean that the individual users are ignorant - sometimes you know something but there’s simply no room to convey it.
Intelligence-wise, however, I disagree with you. Don’t get me wrong, a lot of Lemmy users are braindead trash that would genuinely believe that 50 is 100 because it is not 0, eager to vomit “ackshyually” (a sign of knowledge and stupidity), fallacious as a brick, so goes on; however, they’re proportionally less of an issue than the morons that you’d find in Twitter, Facebook, Reddit etc.
It’s pretty clear that democratically speaking, we do not object to companies arbitrarily removing access to purchased video games. Only a minority objects to it.
It’s more like “people don’t know about the issue, or how it affects them, as they’re busier with their everyday lives”. This happens a fair bit.
Additionally, the graph shows that the movement had huge fervour at the start but then lost steam. So:
EDIT: can someone convince PewDiePie to at least talk about the campaign?
“Hic est aedus!” “«Aedus»?? Haedus uel aedes?” “Sic.”
[“There’s a goom here!” “«Goom»?? A goat, or a room?” “Yup, that’s it.”]
…okay the joke doesn’t work when translated.
Kids and dogs:
So yup, having one is perfect practice for the other! Although people typically do the opposite (use dogs to train for kids).
I should’ve taken spelling-based transcription errors into account; my bad! (This happens a lot, even among professional linguists.)
Variety-wise odds are that you speak the Caipira dialect, given the region of origin. Or potentially a mixed dialect. Either way it’s [i u] all the way in MG, and almost all the way in SP.
To be a moral agent, your actions towards others need to have consequences for yourself - be those consequences direct, social, emotional, or something else. And intelligence on itself doesn’t provide those consequences.
The nearest that you could do, with AGI alone, would be to hardcode it with ethical principles, but that’s another matter. (I’m saying this because people often conflate ethics and morality, even if they’re two different cans of worms.)
I’m sure a linguist could dive way more into depth, but “not English words” is the equivalent of “not a true Scotsman”.
Pretty much. Once speakers start using the word, and expecting others to understand it, it’s already part of the lexicon of that language. Specially if you see signs of phonetic adaptation, like /ø/ becoming /u:/ in a language with no /ø/ (see: “lieu”) - and yet it’s exactly why people complain about those words.
And this sort of complain isn’t even new. Nor the backslash agianst it, as Catullus 84 shows for Latin and Greek.
No problem - I’ve seen worse. I’ve done worse.
(I’m fine, thanks! I hope you’re doing well too.)
That seems sensible.
Even a hypothetically true artificial general intelligence would still not be a moral agent, thus it cannot be held responsible for its actions; as such, whoever deploys and maintains it should be held responsible. That’s doubly true with LLMs as they aren’t even intelligent to begin with.
I couldn’t find it to show you, but I remember an episode of The Osbournes where Ozzy put the pet food bowl in the middle of the kitchen, Sharon warned him “don’t do this, you’ll eventually kick it”, then after some time Ozzy kicked the bowl and blamed their pet for moving the bowl to that position.
I don’t know if Ozzy has victim mentality, but people with victim mentality do this sort of thing all the time - they never acknowledge that they did something that caused them an issue. And that’s bad for both the ones around them and for themselves.
and likewise data as [ˈd̪äːt̪ä] “dah-tah.”
More like [ˈd̪ät̪ä], no long vowel. There’s also some disagreements if short /a/ was [ä] or [ɐ], given the symmetry with /e i o u/ as [ɛ ɪ ɔ ʊ]. (I can go deeper on this if anyone wants.)
Another thing that people don’t often realise, when they say “you should pronounce it like in Latin!”, is that Latin /d t/ were different from English/German /d t/. They were considerably less aspirated, and as your transcription shows they were dental.
That’s just details though. Your core point (Latin didn’t use a diphthong in this word) is 100% correct.
English covers hundreds of accents and multiple English speaking countries. There isn’t just one pronunciation.
I’m listing the variants that I use.
I’m aware that all three languages have heavy internal variation; for example the Portuguese word could be also pronounced as ['dä.ðuʃ], and a lot of N. Italian speakers don’t really do the compensatory lengthening that I do.
a specific kind of “R” (I have no English examples on mind
General American rendering of “butter” as [bʌɾɚ] uses it.
Kind of off-topic but “Brazilian Portuguese” is not an actual variety (language or dialect). It’s more like a country-based umbrella term, the underlying varieties (like Baiano, Paulistano, etc.) often don’t share features with each other but do it with non-Brazilian varieties.
There’s a good example of that in your own transcription of the word “arauto” as /a’ɾawto/. You’re probably a Sulista speaker*, like me; the others would raise that vowel to /u/, regardless of country because they share vowel raising. (Unless we’re counting Galician into the bag, as it doesn’t raise /o/ to /u/ either. But Galician is better dealt separately from Portuguese.)
*PR minus “nortchi”, SC minus Florianópolis Desterro, northern RS, Registro-SP.
Desculpe-me pela nerdice não requisitada, ma’ é que adoro falar de idiomas.
It’s both things, and subjected to wide variation:
| - | Stressed | Unstressed |
|---|---|---|
| Prevocalic | /ði:/ | /ði/, /ðɪ/, /ð/ |
| Preconsonantal | /ði:/, /ðʌ/ | /ðə/ |
Source for those pronunciations, Wiktionary.
To complicate it further some varieties merge /ʌ/ and /ə/, or /ɪ/ and /ə/. And I’m not even taking into account varieties using a different consonant, /t θ d f v/.
As I mentioned in another thread, about the same link, whoever is left moderating that shithole lacks dignity and care about the userbase to do anything.