It’s an issue for perovskite cells. “Traditional” silicon cells (which makes up probably 90+% of current installs) last 40+ years.
Tens of thousands of innocents dead? Uh… No. I would think there were far more effective methods that should have been used.
Isn’t this the definition of contempt of court?
Kellogg’s Cereal is not buying Raytheon Aerospace.
-equivalent headline
I’m literally 100% the opposite. Give me some morels, porcini, lions mane… anything but shiitake.
You uh… want to give a single example of solar panel manufacturing waste that is as deadly as nuclear waste in a thousand years?
Humanity has never built anything that has intentionally lasted 10,000 years, much less 250,000.
It’s the height of arrogance to think your society will last a thousand times longer than any in the history of the world.
Zee was zee long before posh English twats decided to say zed.
Source: my ass
How does 16, 14, or 12 AWG tell you anything about ampacity?
Every Logitech mouse I’ve owned has failed mechanically.
This take is so incredibly ignorant of history and reality I can’t even…
Yeah, it’s almost impossible to build with bricks in California. (Earthquakes)
Now do cumulative subsidies over the last 80 years. Nuclear had its shot and failed.
Because it doesn’t go to the military. It goes to the MIC.
People have a hard-on about nuclear being “baseload” power and renewables being intermittent. Solar/wind plus batteries to add dispatchability is a valid comparison to nuclear if you only want to talk about baseload.
Why could they not overrule that finding? That’s literally what appeals to higher courts are for.
Because other drivers are blinded…
It’s impossible to underestimate this supreme court.
Draft Jon Stewart