• 0 Posts
  • 317 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle


  • For people that promote one over the other, my answer is always “why not both”?

    Areas that are good for nuclear are likely not as good for solar or wind. The latter two are generally more sustainable, but also more temperamental towards environmental conditions for output.

    So my thought is, built all three in the locations best suited to whatever, and also build to storage capacity where possible to manage peak/off-peak loads.








  • phx@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•nice.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’d imagine that - similar to the oil and infrastructure targets they’re also hitting in the last 6mo - it has taken awhile to get the technology and personnel into locations where they could actually hit them.

    Russia is a big country, which means that getting in far enough to hit the “good stuff” isn’t easy, but it also means that protecting it all now that Ukraine has made inroads is also going to be difficult.






  • It’s a bit of both. Yes, Republicans have a bad track record in general, bit also has they’ve gotten worse and more blatant about it.

    I don’t know if this guy is a “Republican who voted in 2024 and now regrets the choices coming home to roost” or “somebody who has been a long time Republican but at least had enough brains not to vote for the racist goon squad more recently”, but at least there’s some growing awareness there.

    The Republican party is gone. Now you’ve got the Appeasement party and the MAGA party and both could really benefit from jettisoning a bunch the members that have pushed them towards such and away from the people.