• 2 Posts
  • 193 Comments
Joined 16 days ago
cake
Cake day: September 14th, 2025

help-circle




  • Probably not it — I’m about 30 years out of date on D&D — but it does sound overpowered and it is associated with Rillifane:

    https://forums.giantitp.com/showthread.php?448029-Post-Your-Chosen-Templates-Here

    It seems that a lot of people come to the FR boards looking for info on Chosen of the various deities. To put it quite simply, the majority of them don’t actually exist. So on the old FR boards, a group of members got together and started making their own homemade Chosen templates.

    I have no idea what “the old FR boards” are, but if it was old in 2013, it’s probably getting back towards the time you were looking at.

    Chosen of Rillifane

    Chosen of Rillifane Rallathil by green elven vampire

    Also known as The Master of the Great Oak

    Its a template that can be added to any Elf or Half Elf. A Chosen of Rillifane uses the character’s statistics and special abilities except as noted below.

    BONUS SPELLS (Sp): Constant ~ ~ Barkskin, Find the Path, Pass without trace. At will ~ ~ Tree Stride, Plant Growth, Snare.
    5/day:~ ~ Greenfire, Holy Smite. 3/day~ ~ Change Staff, Spell Immunity. 1/day~ ~ Shambler, Command Plants.

    Immunities (Ex): Chosen of Rillifane are Immune to ageing effects and do not age. They are also immune to all attacks and special abilities from creatures with the Plant subtype.

    Forest feast (Ex): The chosen does not need to eat or drink while in forested areas.

    Rillifane’s Acorns (Sp): The Chosen can cause a barrage of acorns to launch from her hands, from the ground, or from an oak tree within 20 yards. The acorns can fly up to 50 yards, striking any enemy the chosen wishes. She can summon up to 2 acorns for every character level attained. Each acorn requires a successful ranged touch attack to hit and deal 1d4 points of damage each. This ability can be used 3 times a day.

    The Leaflord’s Amber Prison (Su): The chosen may encase a target in a hard, translucent coating of fossil resin in a yellow, orange hue. If the target makes a successful Fort save (DC 30) the prison dissipates without effect. If saving throw fails then target is caught in the amber prison just as the effects of a Hold Monster spell. The amber prison has an AC of 25 and a hardness of 30 with 75 hitpoints. Living targets encased in the prison suffocate in 2 rounds and die. No spells may be cast from inside the prison and cannot be cast at the target inside. This ability can be used once a day.

    The Great Oak’s gift (Sp): The chosen may take the form of a huge Treant of 13HD once a day. While in this form she has all the natural abilities of a treant and may cast spells as normal with no penalties.

    Quickened spells (Sp): The chosen is granted the ability to cast certain spells as if using the Quicken Spell feat. The spells are all considered spell-like abilities and may be cast once a day each as a sorcerer of her total character level.

    • Claws of the beast
    • Cloudburst
    • Quillfire
    • Detect Crossroads
    • Blinding Spittle
    • Mass Awaken
    • Blindsight
    • Tortoise Shell
    • Healing Sting

    Saves: The character adds + 2 as a bonus to all saving throws.

    Abilities: Increase from the character as follows: Dexterity +4, Strength +2 Charisma +2, Wisdom +4.

    Skills: Wilderness lore, Handle animal, Animal empathy, and Move silently are class skills, regardless of the character’s class.

    Feats: (You gain these feats automaticly without meeting their prerequisites) Weapon Focus (quarter staff), Foe Hunter, Forester.

    Climate/Terrain: Same as the character.
    Organization: Same as the character, But must be a devoted follower of Rillifane Rallathil.
    Challenge Rating: Same as the character +5.
    Alignment: CG, CN, N
    Treasure: Same as the character.
    Advancement: Same as the character






  • Canada called me a couple of weeks ago, they want to be part of it

    https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GirlfriendInCanada

    Girlfriend in Canada

    A convenient way for a character to disabuse the idea that they’re either gay, too socially inept for a relationship or simply unlucky in love is to claim that they indeed have a girlfriend — but the other characters have never met her because she lives in Canada. She doesn’t visit very often, but when she does they just spend all day in bed. Look, here’s her entry in his phone’s contact list. No, you can’t see a picture.

    The idea is that since “she” lives in a different country, and presumably would have to get a passport and go through all that hassle in order to visit her “boyfriend”, it’s particularly tempting to make her Canadian as a way of discouraging others from asking too many questions.

    The tactic could be scaled up.


  • Hmm.

    So for some software, you can just increase the price.

    But…I wonder what that will do to the cost of video games. Typically, those are closer to one-off releases, not packages where new releases exist and are regularly purchased or subscriptions are in place.

    I’d expect this to increase the cost of maintenance, if there are legal obligations on publishers to monitor, notify, and deploy security fixes for their software and upstream. You’d think that it might encourage vendors to EOL software sooner; pull it off Steam or the like, mark as no longer supported.

    Maybe there are some exemptions somewhere that affect those.



  • tal@olio.cafetolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldWe have POSIX at home
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    What’s the big deal with POSIX? Why are ppl constantly discussing what is and isn’t posix compliant?

    The short version: it’s a least-common-denominator standard that spans multiple Unix and Unix-like systems, so if you write to it, your software can fairly-trivially run on various systems.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POSIX

    Windows has some level of Microsoft-provided Posix support, which is what the post is alluding to. I am fairly confident that it doesn’t have full Posix compliance. Cygwin, a separate, non-Microsoft, open-source effort, might qualify.

    kagis

    Okay, apparently it does confirm to a portion of the Posix standard:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_POSIX_subsystem

    The subsystem only implements the POSIX.1 standard – also known as IEEE Std 1003.1-1990 or ISO/IEC 9945-1:1990 – primarily covering the kernel and C library programming interfaces which allowed a program written for other POSIX.1-compliant operating systems to be compiled and run under Windows NT. The Windows NT POSIX subsystem did not provide the interactive user environment parts of POSIX, originally standardized as POSIX.2. That is, Windows NT did not provide a POSIX shell nor any Unix commands out of the box, except for pax. The NT POSIX subsystem also did not provide any of the POSIX extensions that postdated the creation of Windows NT 3.1, such as those for POSIX Threads or POSIX IPC.




  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Gillette

    In September 2025, he called for Democratic Representative Pramila Jayapal to be executed for encouraging anti-Trump protests, claiming that she supported the “overthrow of the American government”.[8][9] Gillette had previously expressed support for people arrested as a result of the January 6 United States Capitol attack, calling them “political prisoners”.[9][10] Earlier that month, he had also made social media posts that reject the concept of Islamophobia while calling Muslims “savages” and “terrorists”.[11]

    He doesn’t sound like a very nice person.

    EDIT: Honestly, most of his Twitter stuff is yelling, too.

    https://x.com/AzRepGillette

    e.g. to pick a random item:

    Senator Mark Kelly:

    This Pride Month, we honor the courage and contributions of LGBTQ+ Americans who’ve fought—and continue to fight—for equality in Arizona and across the country. Our country is better because of you.

    Representative John Gillette:

    What about D-Day… always your pathetic pandering. Our country is free because from D-Day - Aug 17 th, 33K Americans died defeating tyranny. We remember that, not groomer awareness month.




  • I’m guessing that this case could go either way, if appealed.

    If you’re a citizen, there are some strong restrictions on what the government can do.

    But there have been examples where the Executive Branch is accorded a great deal of leeway in being able to determine whether non-citizens may enter the country, including using criteria that would not be permissible if applied to citizens. IIRC from past reading, there is unresolved territory in case law.

    kagis for an example

    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/408/753/

    Kleindienst v. Mandel

    This action was brought to compel the Attorney General to grant a temporary nonimmigrant visa to a Belgian journalist and Marxian theoretician whom the American plaintiff appellees had invited to participate in academic conferences and discussions in this country. The alien had been found ineligible for admission under §§ 212(a)(28)(D) and (G)(v) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, barring those who advocate or publish “the economic, international, and governmental doctrines of world communism.” The Attorney General had declined to waive ineligibility as he has the power to do under § 212(d) of the Act, basing his decision on unscheduled activities engaged in by the alien on a previous visit to the United States, when a waiver was granted. A three-judge District Court, although holding that the alien had no personal entry right, concluded that citizens of this country had a First Amendment right to have him enter and to hear him, and enjoined enforcement of § 212 as to this alien.

    Held: In the exercise of Congress’ plenary power to exclude aliens or prescribe the conditions for their entry into this country, Congress in § 212(a)(28) of the Act has delegated conditional exercise of this power to the Executive Branch. When, as in this case, the Attorney General decides for a legitimate and bona fide reason not to waive the statutory exclusion of an alien, courts will not look behind his decision or weigh it against the First Amendment interests of those who would personally communicate with the alien. Pp. 408 U. S. 761-770.

    So, in that case, the guy was barred from entry to the US because he had been an advocate of world communism. However, the government could not create laws against citizens doing so, because that would violate their First Amendment rights.

    kagis

    Ah, but this says that while the government does have a lot of leeway as to permitting entry, courts have, in the past, found a distinction between permitting entry initially and whether-or-not a non-citizen resident may be deported:

    https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/aliens/

    Supreme Court precedents hold that aliens are entitled to lesser First Amendment protections while seeking to enter the United States, because an alien has no right to enter the country, as per United States ex rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy (1950).

    During the McCarthy Era, in Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580 (1952), the U.S. allowed the deportation of a legal resident alien who was a member of the Communist Party, but Justice William O. Douglas persuasively argued in dissent that “An alien, who is assimilated in our society, is treated as a citizen so far as his property and his liberty are concerned.”

    In matters involving alien exclusion and naturalization, Congress has historically been permitted broad regulatory powers, so the government has been able to use the political viewpoints of aliens against them where content-based distinctions against citizens would be impermissible. Some examples:

    • Exclusion of a British anarchist was at issue in Turner v. Williams (1904);
    • Harisiades v. Shaughnessy (1952), cited above, concerned deportation of communists; and
    • Kleindienst v. Mandel (1972) examined denial of a travel visa to a Marxist.

    Legal aliens enjoy First Amendment rights

    Once situated lawfully in the United States, aliens enjoy First Amendment rights.

    As Justice Francis W. Murphy described the law in his concurrence in Bridges v. Wixon (1945), “the Bill of Rights is a futile authority for the alien seeking admission for the first time to these shores. But once an alien lawfully enters and resides in this country he becomes invested with the rights guaranteed by the Constitution to all people within our borders.”

    In that case, the Court reversed the deportation of labor activist Harry Bridges, an Australian, because of statements he had made that prosecutors charged indicated “affiliation” with the Communist Party. Writing for the Court, Justice William O. Douglas concluded that “freedom of speech and of the press is accorded aliens residing in this country. . . . [T]he literature published by Harry Bridges, the utterances made by him were entitled to that protection.”

    Developments during Trump Administration

    The Trump Administration has sought both to restrict U.S. entry of non-citizens who oppose U.S. policies and to expel those within the country who have participated in political protests that the administration disfavors.

    In 2025, the administration sought to revoke the student visa and green card of Mahmoud Khalil for his participation in pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University.

    It did so under the Immigration and Nationality Act, which authorizes the Secretary of State to deport any individual who is “adversarial to the foreign policy and national security interests of the United States of America.” After his arrest, Khalil was moved to a detention center in Louisiana and the government made additional arguments that Khalil obtained his green card without mentioning his employment by the Syria Office in the British Embassy in Beirut. He is now scheduled for a hearing before an immigration judge in New Jersey.

    In the meantime, the government has arrested a Tufts University Ph.D. student, Rumeysa Ozturk, whom it has also transported to Louisiana, apparently on the basis that she coauthored an article criticizing the university’s response to the Palestinian crisis. The government has also deported Dr. Rasha Alawieh, who was working at Brown University, on the basis that she had attended the funeral of a Hezbollah leader in Lebanon. In addition, the government has arrested Badar Khan Suri, an Indian national researcher at Georgetown University, alleging that Suri was supporting Hamas propaganda and antisemitism. Suri has challenged this detention in court and is awaiting a hearing before an immigration judge in Texas. Yet another foreign student at the Carlson School of Management at the University of Minnesota, which was a site of pro-Palestinian protests, has been arrested.

    In resolving these cases, courts will likely clarify the scope of existing legislation, whether the power asserted by the Secretary of State violates due process, and the degree to which resident aliens who are legally residing within the United States are protected by the First Amendment and other constitutional guarantees.