Don’t be worse than Russia. Please fix.

  • 9 Posts
  • 2.41K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 26th, 2023

help-circle
  • as if that somehow makes this concept not only feasible but also fits into profit margins to be able to secure the additional funding.

    > mentions AWS

    > says POSIX is not feasable

    Are you imagining them renting AWS and running windows?

    Go ahead and tell those big corpos to stop being anti social, I’m sure that’ll secure the funding and commitments necessary industry-wide

    That’s what we are doing. Even your argument is about success.

    Let me guess, you are from USA. That’s how we have healthcare and labour laws.















  • One of the big issues I see from a developer standpoint is the potential for leaking proprietary code

    It is no longer proprietary then.

    that they may not want to publicize like things related to authorization,

    If it has any impact, then it means they were insecure all along. Or in other words, they had CWE-656 vulnreability.

    server side anti cheat implementations, etc.

    There are lots of effective opensource anticheats. Server-side, obviously. See minecraft anticheats.

    and potentially inter-org collaboration to develop common OS standards

    So, POSIX?

    it could incur risk to the org’s other current/future projects in addition to helping outside sources get a leg up on said other current/future projects.

    It’s called anti-social behaviour. “Why help someone else?”


  • so many boomers retiring/dying

    Most of which are in bloated managerial staff. And humanity already can dramatically increase labour efficiency, it just doesn’t do it. Not because “humanity is not ready”, but because those, who benefit from capitalism, choose not to.

    each much less experienced and capable than those they are replacing

    Same as last always. Nothing changed.

    This cannot help but put the lever of power in the hands of organized youth.

    Eventual death of current old will eventually put lever of power in current youth.


  • Your reply basically was “even if they will not profit from it, they still can abuse company by doing it”. It does not address critique of implicit assumptions such takes.

    Such position is fundamentally anti-social and similar to making shopping center contaminate enviroment with radiation when company, that owns it, goes bankrupt, because “it would open ways for abuse”. Except it’s even more nonsensical(see 2, 3 and 4).

    If anything, this is not an argument against SKG, this is argument against capitalism as a whole.