• Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 个月前

    Sorry, I know I’m not amazing at explaining things.

    I’ll try rephrasing as a question. What should the company at this point of time do?

    The company incorrectly built a house on the wrong property plot, they realize their mistake far too late in the process due to someone’s negilance along the process whether it’s the development company or the construction company maybe even both.

    They have reached out to the person whose life they fucked up basically because they now have more in taxes and also now have to deal with squatters and vandalism on the house that they have stated they don’t want.

    The landowner has refused to talk it out with the company at all regarding any type of suggestions it’s just been a straight no to any proposal(which as stated multiple times already they were not obligated to do I understand this) while also not bringing anything new to the table including anything to do with restoration or bulldozing(again not obligated)

    Aside from bringing into the legal system what can that company do?

    I said before I think the right thing to do is completely bulldoze the lot to allow for the landowner to build what they want on it, but I find it very very weird that this is not been proposed by the party that would be most likely beneficial from this transaction

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 个月前

      Sorry, I know I’m not amazing at explaining things.

      Honestly, to me you’re crystal clear, its just people, including myself, are pushing back for the reasons I’ve stated before, and again below.

      but I find it very very weird that this is not been proposed by the party that would be most likely beneficial from this transaction

      You just did it again. You are purchase victim blaming.

      Its not her job to propose anything, its the company/developers. She doesn’t have to propose/negotiate ANYTHING, they have to offer a recompense that she is satisified with and makes her whole. The onus is on the company.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 个月前

      They have reached out to the person whose life they fucked up basically because they now have more in taxes and also now have to deal with squatters and vandalism on the house that they have stated they don’t want.

      They in fact did not reach out at all. The property owner found out from the realtor who sold the house and not even in a we fucked up way. From the article above:

      She was unaware of the construction until she got a call last year from a real estate broker who had learned of the mistake.

      “He told me, ‘I just sold the house, and it happens to be on your property. So, we need to resolve this,’”

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 个月前

        I am under the understanding that they were not even aware of the issue until that point, but I could be wrong there.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 个月前

          That would be negligence if true then. The point still stands that the developer was not the one to make contact, it was the realtor (who would be working for their and the developer’s benefit) who reached out and tried to put the onus on her from the get go.

    • Apollo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 个月前

      You are fine atgetting across your view, the issue people are having is that your views are really fucking stupid.

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 个月前

      I’ll try rephrasing as a question. What should the company at this point of time do?

      If she wants the house removed and her land restored, then that is what the company should do.