• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Incorporation is just a formality required by law. Corporations could still exist through internal cooperation without that, as long as there is no outside force that disrupts them.

    In the absence of the state, a corporate structure can pursue its own coercive methods to maintain market dominance. And of course, some markets are naturally prone to monopoly due to the barriers to competition.

    Anything the state can do, a large enough corporation can do as well. So this logic just doesn’t add up.

    • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      But without a state above them to reinforce laws the corporation would have to enforce them. So they don’t have to follow their own laws, and thus become something else. More like a warband of kingdom or junta.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      What do you think is the quality that would make such an organization still be a “corporation”?

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You could argue at some point it wouldn’t be one anymore but what I’m saying is that nothing in this process of gaining power requires a state.

        In a functional and lasting anarchist society, there would need to be norms and systems in place to stop this kind of authoritarianism from cropping up.