• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Eugenics is mostly associated with selective breeding so that’s a no in that regard. I do think modifying our children genetically will become more common place and will be an important part of future off earth colonies.

  • SolidGrue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    WTF kind of question is this?

    Is it a thing? OK, yeah? A concept of an idea, maybe.

    Is it anything approaching moral, ethical or humane? No.
    Nooo.
    Nope.
    Nuh-uh.

    Thanks for coming to my TED talk.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah it’s one of those things that in theory it could make sense, it could be. However since we are humans, there does not exist any way that would not be morally abhorrent to some group of people. There’s zero way that in doing it this way wouldn’t destroy x group of people. And that’s why it can never be done. Eugenics is just too close to genocide.

  • Revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s impossible for me listen to someone arguing in favor of eugenics without hearing, “we’ve gotta get rid of those people- you know the ones in talking about, right?” Fuck that noise.

    It’s always some narcissistic asshole who thinks they’re the prototype for a new master race.

    • Don_Dickle@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I believe in the right hands that some types of eugenics can do a world of good. I know hitler and japanese did it and it got an ugly label. But what about if we could tell a parent this child will have no diseases his entire life at the stage of birth? Kind of like Gataca

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        All other concerns aside, I think if we start controlling genes we’ll end up writing our genes into a corner.

        • papertowels@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I just think of south Korean beauty standards and how I have a hard time differentiating all the kpop artists due to the homogeneous beauty standard being universally applied.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    No. Read dystopian novels like Brave New World and you’ll understand why.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    We have entire communities for unpopular opinions and shitposting, yet you chose to post here on ML?

  • SLfgb@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Yea. It exists and is a terrible idea. Like it’s a creepy ideology that rears its head in too many places.

    Selective breeding of humans is not and never was a good idea. It comes with forced sterilisation, marriage bans, stigmatisation of characteristics contributing to naturally occuring diversity, supremacist thinking and fascist pseudo-scientific tendencies.

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Used to be a bigger fan, but for the same reason I became more libertarian I’m not so sure it’s a practical philosophy. The biggest issue is that as soon as someone decides what is or isn’t good genetics you get a lot of bias. The majority of the human experience is social anyways.

  • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 minutes ago

    Don’t approve, because we can’t study it without injecting adjectives or racism,

    It’s raising it’s ugly head again because AI is finding new “correlations”.