Bubba Copeland shot himself in front of police on Friday, days after he begged 1819 News not to expose his private life.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      112
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s conservative and even had a meeting with Trump. That’s the worst of it I think, he was ok with persecuting trans people till he was outed.

      • Drusas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did you even read the article? It’s specifically says that he was supportive of trans people.

        • darq@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel pity for this person, they deserved better.

          That said. You cannot be supportive of LGBT people, and vote for the Republican party. Republicans are quite openly hostile to LGBT people, both in rhetoric and in policy. You can’t say you are supportive of a group while voting to strip them of their legal recognitions and protections.

          • gkd@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree with your comment, and I don’t think you’re saying otherwise. But definitely important to note that a lot of LGBT+ folks start off on the wrong side because of how they were raised, religion, etc. and the internal trans/homophobia that causes.

            That said, there are also though a sizeable number of LGBT+ “one of the good ones” who think their support of republicans will keep them from being targeted by the laws they want to introduce (it won’t. This case itself is proof of that.)

            I think that’s the important lesson to learn here for anyone voting republican and being a part of the LGBT community. The people you are voting for will not let you be just because you’re voting for them.

          • Drusas@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did you read the article? He literally spoke with people online about how to transition and such. That is supporting them.

          • Bizarroland@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            I take small umbrage with the idea that you cannot support LGBTQ people and vote in a way that doesn’t support your personal beliefs.

            We are all of us paradoxical and hypocritical. Maybe they weren’t pro-republican they were anti-democrat. I don’t fucking know.

            That aside, I get what you’re saying, but your political stance is not the end all and be all of who you are, and as the Republican party has proved beyond any shadow of any doubt being hypocritical is the name of their game.

            This one person could have been very pro-trans and yet still support the Republican agenda in every other way.

            Plus, we don’t know if they were pro-trans or LGBTQ, all that we know is that they were not publically anti-trans.

            • darq@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I take small umbrage with the idea that you cannot support LGBTQ people and vote in a way that doesn’t support your personal beliefs.

              I don’t care.

              You cannot vote to make someone’s life measurably worse, and claim to support them.

              That’s not my “personal beliefs”, this is people’s lives and wellbeing.

              We are all of us paradoxical and hypocritical.

              That is fair. And that is why I pity this person. And why I’m not talking about Leopards Eating People’s Faces. This person was clearly troubled.

              That doesn’t change what I’m saying though. I’m not trying to morally judge this individual with what I’m saying. All I am saying is that the net effect of the actions of someone who votes Republican, is not supportive of LGBT people, regardless of their personal beliefs.

              Maybe they weren’t pro-republican they were anti-democrat. I don’t fucking know.

              That’s worse. You understand how that’s worse, right?

              This one person could have been very pro-trans and yet still support the Republican agenda in every other way.

              Human rights are pretty much a deal-breaker. Or at least they should be.

              Plus, we don’t know if they were pro-trans or LGBTQ, all that we know is that they were not publically anti-trans.

              You have misinterpreted my comment. I’m not trying to judge this person.

              I’m making a general statement that it is not possible to support a demographic while simultaneously voting to take away their legal recognitions and protections.

        • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          For some people, there are only ever two sides, one all good, one all bad and there can not be people in-between or on each side that aren’t 100% a walking trope integrated with all traits of the “side”. It’s quite sad really.

          • BassaForte@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            We seriously need to do away with our two party system. Everything wrong with the country and the division is due to that. Ranked choice voting needs to be a priority.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The trump meeting was because his town was badly hit in a natural disaster, not necessarily something that he would have sought kut

    • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      it does not appear he had taken any public positions against LGBTQ issues that could be construed as hypocritical

        • DreamerofDays@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would imagine that becoming mayor in certain parts of the country is much easier if you’re a member of the dominant party in the region.

          • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            Or existing in society at all. Sometimes in those parts of the country the first question upon meeting someone is “what church do you go to”.

            • DreamerofDays@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, he didn’t. But people get to want things. Sometimes they want things for themselves, sometimes they want things for their communities.

        • rchive@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can disagree with your party on one issue. There are tons of Democrats who are opposed to increased gun control, for example.

          • darq@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            But it’s not just “an issue”. We are talking about a demographic and their legal recognition. No I’m sorry but we cannot agree to disagree on something so fundamental as equal treatment of people.

            It’s not comparable gun control.

            • rchive@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m talking about whether people are physically capable of breaking with their party on a single issue. They obviously are.

              Gallup poll

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Disagreeing on policy is one thing; disagreeing on human rights is another. You cannot be a Republican and have respect for queer rights at the same time. It has to be a 100% deal-breaker.

            • rchive@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not sure what you’re talking about. There are tons of Republicans who support gay rights in some fashion, even if it’s not a majority position within the party.

              Gallup poll

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No, there are precisely zero Republicans who support gay rights. What you’ve cited is a poll showing some who claim to, but are lying. Their deeds, not their words, prove their true intentions.

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            How likely are those Democrats to get bullied to the point of suicide if their “secret” of being against increased gun control was to come out? Or to preemptively commit suicide in anticipation of the bullying they’re going to receive?

            This is not the same thing. Democrats are, generally speaking, flexible about a lot of their positions. It’s how they wind up with problem members like Manchin and Sinema. The Republican party is very different.

            • rchive@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s not the right comparison. He didn’t commit suicide because he was ashamed of supporting gay rights, he was ashamed of wanting to cross dress and of having engaged in the activity. Regardless of politics, that’s a pretty uncommon behavior. Most people don’t want other people to know they’re a sexual deviant of some kind. I’d guess that this behavior is much more maligned in conservative circles than liberal or left, for sure, but the point is that it’s not just the breaking from the standard beliefs of that side.

              • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’d guess that this behavior is much more maligned in conservative circles than liberal or left

                And that, right there, is exactly my point.

          • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Good luck trying to get the terminally online to understand the nuances and complexities of the human condition

    • Rusticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The GOP has created a really shitty life for a lot of people.

      It’s a feature, not a bug.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      He was a Republican so yes he voted repeatedly to hurt LGBTQ people AS LONG AS IT WASNT HIM

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you read the article, it said, about halfway through, that he never spoke up on LGBTQ issues despite being a Republican.

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It says he hasn’t posted or supported anything publicly so he wasn’t a hypocrite, he belonged to the wrong party though, I do feel bad for his family because he doesn’t seem to be a right wing asshole