• systemglitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Is anyone, not virtue signalling, truly upset by this? It looks like a good, but small beginning of a purge long overdue.

      • positiveWHAT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Pointless? Nah, the bourgeois probably needed a reminder of what can happen if they keep shafting people. Recon it won’t be long until the greens starts to remind them too that the climate clock still ticks.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Upset? Maybe his wife or kids. If someone that disgustingly anti-social is even capable of faking a marriage and being a “father”.

        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I can just assume it was about money. Who else would marry such a disgusting human being? …if she was not as equally disgusting though. I really don’t know and not sure I do want to.

          • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I mean how ya gonna marry someone when you know every time you have to go to the hospital theres a 32% chance your husband allows you to just die so he can save 1000$

            • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              You probably could if you’d see this as a great buisiness-idea. Save thousand moneyz for only givimg up one life you don’t even know. To many this obviously seems great.

    • Enkrod@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Upset? No. More like a little uncomfortable. Partly because I’m an idealist who always hopes for the best and most moral and peaceful solutions. Partly because it makes me uncomfortable how little I am angered by this. Sure I absolutely do not want proles to go and kill the bourgeoisie… but I guess it’s not… I don’t feel the need to condemn this. Sometimes things are just… shrug

      But it’s really just a little uncomfortable, like a sock not quite fitting my foot.

      I am far FAR more uncomfortable with someone calling this the good but small beginning of an overdue purge.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I doubt they lost any sleep knowing their dad killed thousands by denying them coverage. Why would i lose sleep for them? Hell, they are probably looking at a juicy life insurance payout, which is more than any of us will get when United kills our loved ones.

      • VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t know but mabe his life insurance will deny it, given he had the pre-condition of being a shitbag CEO.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          They should be fair to him, and roll percentile dice. If it rolls below a 33, the claim gets denied. You know, like UHC does with their “customers”

    • lettruthout@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      On a personal level, yeah it’s got to be a shock. On the other hand they profited off of the suffering of others. My empathy is limited.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Right. The situation could directly correlate. The guy responsible for limiting access to physical and mental healthcare for millions was shot and killed in a premeditated murder. He’s fucking with millions of physically and mentally ill people. Granted, this is the most extreme repercussion for his actions.

        • lobut@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          He didn’t suffer as much as the pain he’s inflicted upon others. He also didn’t bankrupt his family in the process.

          I can’t say this is the way I want society to run … but quite frankly I think we’re all sick of pretending that killing someone with a pen is any different than killing someone with a gun.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Limited empathy is totally fine. Cheering for assassinations is a different thing ( not saying you did).

        I wish the systems this dude profited from were changed. This guy will just be replaced, and the next one will have a security detail ($$$)

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I dunno, I think this might really rattle a few people. It’s one thing to talk about social consequences like not being invited to garden parties or whatever, another entirely to be potentially killed.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I feel bad for his kids, seeing the country laugh and cheer at their father’s death.

      He still earned it, though. Hopefully this inspires them not to follow in his footsteps.

      • frostysauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I feel bad for his kids, seeing the country laugh and cheer at their father’s death.

        Yeah, well, maybe they’ll learn something from it and not go on to be horrible people themselves.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I would be very scared to be the kid of a guy who was assassinated. You know they are the next target.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            There is ever reason to assume the kids would not be Targeted? Killing one person may not satisfy everyone.

            • Drusas@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              If the gunman was angry about healthcare, there is absolutely no reason that he would go for the children after killing the father.

              There’s no logic to it.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    How hated must you be when suddenly leftists, tankies, fascists, conservatives and liberals find themselves in quiet agreement about their feelings on your murder. Even the silence from gun control advocates is deafening.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      To be fair, this isn’t really a “gun control” type situation. A single, targeted, killing, would have been just a successful if it were done with a knife instead. The gun control arguments are more applicable to spree killings.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Absolutely not. We simply have to deal with those killing sprees and just feel bad when it happens because the alternative is the state doing the killing sprees and nobody having any answer.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I mean, the guy would have been able to write their whole message on one knife rather than needing three bullet casings to get it across.

        So I guess environmentalists and the metal industry (Big Metal?) would probably care a bit?

    • Walican132@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s the thing the people who are CEOs don’t want us to think about. It’s not leftists, tankies, fascists, conservatives against each other. It’s them against everyone else.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        The quiet part is the agreement with others you completely disagree with almost always, and even often despise.

    • Ænima@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s why the ruling class pushes all the wedge issues and divisiveness they do. If we could talk to each other, we’d find we had more in common than otherwise expected. I thought the recent surge in union activity could have continued to a general strike across the nation. The rich know what unites us and actively seems to keep us fractured so we don’t realize our combined power.

      Maybe this dude will be a catalyst in a revolution that sets these disgusting, wealthy leeches in their place.

      • Infynis@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Maybe this dude will be a catalyst in a revolution that sets these disgusting, wealthy leeches in their place.

        Even if this isn’t the one, the accelerated pace at which we’re having moments that might should scare the oligarchs

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Everyone has been feeling the pressure of “something is about to happen” for the better part of a decade. That pressure has to vent somewhere.

  • TooManyGames@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Just as a comment, not a suggestion: a society that squeezes its people has to either repress them hard, or at some point expect it to start boiling over. The mob lynching the leaders is what happens once the mob gets desperate enough and are not heard.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Been saying it since 🔔Limbaugh🔔. The idea that we need to pretend it isn’t a good thing when evil people die is some Disney channel bullshit

        • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m still upset we didn’t get anything about snokes back story. Why did he even exist if he was going to do nothing and then die

          • EvilZ@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            It shows how little they actually put effort in character building…

            How can you declare that Snot or Snort or whatever his name is the master of an important character and then boom he’s dead…

            It was so pointless…

            Obi wan kenobi death was purposeful as you see he became stronger in death…

            Stork… Or wait was it snork? Anyway that character didn’t even need to be in the movie…

          • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            He existed purely to develop Kylo. He got fridged.

            Also, what he did do was create the First Order and challenge the whole galaxy, as well as coming up with the idea for Starkiller Base. He did the most out of anyone in the sequels but it was all offscreen. They told, not showed.

    • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yep, I sometimes really feel that that kind of people (you know what I mean) never progressed their morality past Disney cartoons that have it all dumbed down so that toddlers can grasp the concept of right and wrong.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I was thinking earlier… maybe all the lessons in the saturday morning cartoons were really intended to keep the masses from fighting back. I mean, no, the good guys don’t always win in the end. And cheating sure as hell does payoff. They want the masses to take the high road. While they tunnel through anything in thier way.

    • cliffracerflyyy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The evil ones die in tons of Disney movies. That’s where mostly the US of A got their brains washed and consequently celebrate a public execution without due process.

  • VoilaChihuahua@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    It gives me hope that maybe the distant future doesn’t include a privileged class using the rest of us as free labor, fuel, and food…

  • Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The joker is the worst one to use here regardless of the universe you use. In that particular universe he’s more akin to the weird fucking red pill/mra movement than an anti capitalist since he was loosely based on Bernie geatz. It’s why the maga sphere went crazy for what was a series of terrible movies that they entirely miss the point of.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The core message of that movie was anti capitalist, with added messaging on the effects of a deteriorating quality of life/mental health system.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s really not though, it’s about modern moral failings and their outcomes that happen to have economic effects and notably none of the issues persued in the movie are exclusive to capitalist models.

        The Batman universe is to some degree anti capitalist but the protagonist being one of the richest people in the planet who cannonically got that money by theft, violence and arms dealing kinda cancels that out.

        You can read what you want into it but it specifically was not anti capitalist. It’s outright glorification of the Bernie geatz model, ie. A crybaby lower middle class white man who goes bat shit on the subway and blames literally everyone else but himself.

        Similarly Bernie geatz was very much a capitalist.

        • Mango@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Friend, I’m not gonna slam you because it’s clear your intentions are right, but you are misunderstanding the movie big time. I want you to watch it again and pay extra attention to the subway scene and who those people in the scene were.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think you’re misunderstanding the movie friend and none of this was intended as a “slam” so I’m not sure why you would bring that up anyway.

            I have no intention of rewatching either of those dumpster fires. I do love it that the right sees the Bernie goetz vigilante shit and goes “oh shit that’s the point! We gotta take these probably into our own hands!” And you get white nationalist mass shooters that reference the joker. The left goes “Oh shit this movie delves into the moral failings of a deeply sick modern society and also how money is evil… It must be anti capitalist!” It’s just not, it’s a case study on the moral failings of society through the eyes of the mentally ill, the fact you see it as anti capitalist is your mental illness and that’s the point of the movie.

      • rational_lib@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think the message is that there’s a thin line between the hero and the villain. The villain feels the same anger and desire for justice we all do. Just add a bit of delusion, and you can turn Gandhi into Hitler, or Batman into the Joker.