It comes from this paper. Using existing data on recordings and books we obtain a point estimate of around 15 years for optimal copyright term
It makes sense that some copyright protection is beneficial to society as it encourages new works.
But I think the important part is to ensure copyright is non transferable. Then large corporations cannot build (and charge for) large libraries.
Could you imagine AI Cowel piloting a self replicating von Newman probe?
The gold is a financial instrument and not a purchased commercial product being imported for consumption, so it is not subject to import duties or tax.
I want to see your porn metadata.
I was thinking, this is corporate medical screening.
If chopping people’s arms off to make them run faster is a strategy then this is equivalent to chopping of someone’s legs to make them prettier.
15 years of non transferable copyright encourages creativity.
We are all training our own AI models now.
I wonder if Darth Vader had his theme music playing under his cloak as he walked around the death star.
I think you said something but I only heard *******
Tenet. No matter how good your sound system, Nolan requires subtitles.
No problem. The trick is to insult the position, not the person.
I completed a 5 day no shit music festival. Next time I’ll just remember to bring paper.
Limited copyright encourages sharing. This is why patents are good. The problem occurs when the lifespan of the protection is too favourable to a non creator owner.
Protections held as an asset by a corporation do little to encourage innovation.
I don’t see what is stopping the bots invading Lemmy too.
So this is like taking a bet on your FedEx guy being careless. Double the money.
Richard Stallman is another example of someone you wouldn’t describe as hinged, but you are glad exists.