• antizero99@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m confused as well. I thought the idea was that things that ate the plastic would then die and sink to the bottom of the ocean thereby taking it out of the environment.

    • recursive_recursion [they/them]@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      sink to the bottom of the ocean

      would mean that they still exist in the environment

      kinda feels like what’s been happening is the perpetuation of news that ingrains “out of sight out of mind” mentality

      btw this isn’t a criticism against you and more with some news organizations

      Edit: I misunderstood please see comment chain below

      • antizero99@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I thought the nuance of what I was saying would be recognized by communities like this.

        Yes, technically it still exists in the environment. Nothing is ever made to not exist. What I meant was that it would no longer be able to be ingested by any creatures. This is after all where our petroleum deposits came from, millenia of plankton and other creatures dying and being covered up by other matter.

        • recursive_recursion [they/them]@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          ahh I see
          thank you for the clarification as it seems I misunderstood

          What I meant was that it would no longer be able to be ingested by any creatures.

          fair enough, this I can definitely get behind +1