I was watching some YouTube, trying to find some forgotten gems from retro systems. I ran into one about the Jaguar and decided to watch it.

Well, the fellow said a lot of the games were great, and I was kind of curious about that because I don’t think it’s controversial to say there’s only a handful of decent games on the Jag, but this fellow was rating everything highly.

Later on I sat down to think about it and I realized something… after every game the fellow would say “Oh, and you can get it for about $XX.XX.”

At that point the light-bulb went off and I realized this fellow is probably deriving enjoyment from collecting the Jaguar games, not playing them. To him, if he buys a game, plays it for a few minutes to make sure it works, it’s probably a winner for him.

For me, who is getting Jaguar games from uhhhh a friend, I don’t care about collecting them, I just want some fun stuff to play.

Anyway, I learned my lesson: I’ll believe non-collectors’ opinions more than collectors because they are mostly concerned with gameplay instead of how it looks on the shelf, or how rare and difficult it was to acquire.

P.S. I don’t know how “hot” of a take this is, but I figure it’ll probably hurt the feelings of collectors, so that’s why I prefixed it.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 days ago

    Had a buddy with an impressive vinyl collection and an audiophile setup. Awful taste in music, just dogshit.

    • Trail@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Nah, music is subjective. I’m sure your music is dogshit to him as well.

      • Krudler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        I disagree.

        Just in the same way we can point to McDonald’s and say there is nothing good about it from a food perspective; that it barely even qualifies as food…

        We can say the same thing about music. There is music that is so devoid of any kind of artistic output and merit, that no one could say it’s good. In 2025 are still listening to musical greats from several hundred years go but in 50 years, nobody will have a clue who Nikki Manaj is

        • Trail@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I don’t think it’s an equivalent comparison. If you judge McDonald’s for their nutrition value, I’m sure all will agree they are crap and this is something that is objective and scientific.

          There are people though that say they like McDonald’s and buy their food, and people that don’t like it and stay away. This is the subjective part. Musical taste is like your taste in McDonald’s. Some like McDonald’s, some like Mikki Minaj, for their own whatever reason. And it’s fine that they like it. It is their taste. It doesnt have to have artistic merit for them to like it, similar to how McDonald’s doesn’t have to have nutritious value for them to like it.

      • Calavera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Music is completely objective. If I like it than it’s good, if you don’t agree then you are wrong