Well, I get that? But satire presents exaggerated versions of the truth in order to display the absurdity of that truth. I guess I’m just skeptical that the grifter narcissists currently running things are ready for bunker living, but again, there are bunkers, and the tech/hedge fund set has been very apocalyptically oriented last few years, so perhaps.
The argument I can see for it (from the great power geopolitical perspective) is that it would be a nuclear regional war right in Russia/China’s backyard, and might distract/degrade them. But again, the very high chance of total annihilation inherent in this should immediately discount it as a viable action. But we also live in some sort of hyper reality at this point, so perhaps the capitalist death-drive really is being made real right now.
The advantage usa gains isn’t against Russia and China directly. Its against everyone else. usa, Russia and China aren’t going to nuke India/Pakistan if they nuke each other. Everyone knows where the missiles are going. If they aren’t the target they wouldn’t want to set off the MAD cascade. Everyone would just watch.
usa has been proved to be a paper tiger. (they can’t even subdue the 10th poorest nation in the world) If they want to force their will on a smaller nation they just can’t do it anymore. Their economic weapons have been thwarted and workarounds are in place. Their navy is losing billions of dollars in jets to a nation who’s entire air force is a hand full of helicopters. Their tanks and troop carriers have been proven to be 2nd rate and their recruitment is in the toilet. Modern anti air is better than american jets or stealth tech. Regime change and Color revolutions just don’t work anymore. The empire’s power is slipping through its hands like Jesus holding a marble and everyone is watching.
The one thing that nobody can argue against is the american nuclear arsenal. (Russia and China could but don’t want to because it would be messy) But usa can’t use nukes to bully people because they have been locked by a unwritten rule that nukes are only to stop people from attacking you. The international rulebook is in the process of being shredded. The ICJ ICC and UN have been trashed by israel. Genocide is back on the table but the one thing that could turn everything around is if america used its nukes offensively. The whole world would turn against them if they crossed that line.
So how do they get past that blockage? How do they get the only tool they have left out of the tool box?
They get someone else to crack the seal first, break the taboo. but it can’t be done in a way that brings condemnation. The use of nukes needs to be justified. So if both sides have and use nukes? That’s a victimless war crime.
Then usa does a demonstration (which would be Yemen and they’d claim they had a nuke) and then anyone not explicitly protected by a large nuclear power is prey to nuclear blackmail. Canada and greenland would be part of america in months.
Well, I get that? But satire presents exaggerated versions of the truth in order to display the absurdity of that truth. I guess I’m just skeptical that the grifter narcissists currently running things are ready for bunker living, but again, there are bunkers, and the tech/hedge fund set has been very apocalyptically oriented last few years, so perhaps.
The argument I can see for it (from the great power geopolitical perspective) is that it would be a nuclear regional war right in Russia/China’s backyard, and might distract/degrade them. But again, the very high chance of total annihilation inherent in this should immediately discount it as a viable action. But we also live in some sort of hyper reality at this point, so perhaps the capitalist death-drive really is being made real right now.
The advantage usa gains isn’t against Russia and China directly. Its against everyone else. usa, Russia and China aren’t going to nuke India/Pakistan if they nuke each other. Everyone knows where the missiles are going. If they aren’t the target they wouldn’t want to set off the MAD cascade. Everyone would just watch.
usa has been proved to be a paper tiger. (they can’t even subdue the 10th poorest nation in the world) If they want to force their will on a smaller nation they just can’t do it anymore. Their economic weapons have been thwarted and workarounds are in place. Their navy is losing billions of dollars in jets to a nation who’s entire air force is a hand full of helicopters. Their tanks and troop carriers have been proven to be 2nd rate and their recruitment is in the toilet. Modern anti air is better than american jets or stealth tech. Regime change and Color revolutions just don’t work anymore. The empire’s power is slipping through its hands like Jesus holding a marble and everyone is watching.
The one thing that nobody can argue against is the american nuclear arsenal. (Russia and China could but don’t want to because it would be messy) But usa can’t use nukes to bully people because they have been locked by a unwritten rule that nukes are only to stop people from attacking you. The international rulebook is in the process of being shredded. The ICJ ICC and UN have been trashed by israel. Genocide is back on the table but the one thing that could turn everything around is if america used its nukes offensively. The whole world would turn against them if they crossed that line.
So how do they get past that blockage? How do they get the only tool they have left out of the tool box?
They get someone else to crack the seal first, break the taboo. but it can’t be done in a way that brings condemnation. The use of nukes needs to be justified. So if both sides have and use nukes? That’s a victimless war crime.
Then usa does a demonstration (which would be Yemen and they’d claim they had a nuke) and then anyone not explicitly protected by a large nuclear power is prey to nuclear blackmail. Canada and greenland would be part of america in months.