• scaredoftrumpwinning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    His farm would have made a fortune. Everyone from far and wide would come to eat the president’s nuts. I want to think he thought that one through and said yea I’m selling before that becomes a thing . Well that integrity or both

    • Mike D.@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Putting aside he did the right thing, eating the “president’s nuts” is hilarious.

      They would be the perfect side for Billy Beer. Billy was Jimmy Carters brother.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure he did that without being asked because he wanted to avoid the appearance of conflict of interest. That’s the way I heard the story anyhow

    • Caffeinated_Sloth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      15 hours ago

      And openly accepting a winged bribe from Qatar. It boggles my mind that the better world leaders, including a few US politicians, don’t understand how he operates and get in on the game. Give him money and flattery and he’ll do whatever the hell you want.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      During the first term, I was hopeful that at least they would at least codify the norms into laws but considering the emoluments clause is already in the constitution, I guess nothing really matters, and Republicans will defend him no matter what. I guess I should lower my standards and just hope there is a country left for a corrupt Democrat to be elected who blatantly violates everything, to get the Republicans to set some standards for the office.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I think “what’s good for me right now” is fundamental to the right wing viewset. Hypocrisy isn’t a factor because that doesn’t typically intersect with “is this good for me right now?”

    You can point out they said X and now they say Not-X, but that’s going to be as effective as someone telling you that your math is wrong because yesterday you were wearing green and today you’re wearing brown. it’s just a non-sequitur to them.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I usually agree but sometimes I think it’s a mistake to attribute any principle to them whatsoever. More and more I think the right wing has no actual center and is just an agglomeration of voters being swung around and manipulated by a random list of media and political hustlers. They’re a blob of chaos being goaded forward by this grifter and now that grifter. I’d like to believe there is any kind of guiding principle they have in mind but I don’t think so. They are so and so many asses braying toward so and so many dangled carrots.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    From which came the (now largely archaic) phrase “more x than Carter’s got peanuts.