I originally posted this on the other site back when I took the picture, and it resulted in a lot of confused comments, especially from Americans, eventually getting removed by overzealous mods. Either way, I promise you that this date does not exist, and has never existed.

  • Freewheel@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    When read in the only proper order, it translates (for the non-technical types), to February 23rd, 2029.

    • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      By that logic, you should fully spell out the month. FEB29 has no confusion. If you use the number then use the ISO standard.

    • eric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’m so tired of this “proper order” date debate among regions. Can’t we just accept that there can be more than one correct way to do things?

      We commonly write dates 02/29/23 because we speak or write “February 29th 2023” while in other languages, it’s customary to speak or write “29th of February 2023” leading them to the common format 29/02/23.

      Edit: to curb the ISO standard comments, yes, that is the most efficient and organized way to write a date, but how many of you speak dates in ISO format? If you don’t commonly say “2023 February 29th” out loud, then you intrinsically understand that not all situations call for the ISO standard.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m so tired of this “proper order” date debate among regions. Can’t we just accept that there can be more than one correct way to do things?

        International Organization for Standardization (ISO) be like:

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        Written language doesn’t have to follow spoken language. The ISO is for written things not spoken.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        The reason you keep hearing about it is because people won’t use the standard

        • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          you actually think you’ll be able to convince anyone even remotely stupid or stubborn to use this? you must have never tried anything like this before then…

        • Cjwii@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Real English is American you bloody redcoats are always appropriating our culture

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s usually easy to determine which order the person commenting observes too, just from context. I’ve never understood the confusion.