Compared to Bluetooth:

  • 60% lower power consumption
  • Six times higher data transmission speed
  • 1/30th the latency
  • 7 dB improvement anti-interference for a more stable connection
  • Twice the coverage distance, and
  • 10 times more network connections

US won’t benefit from this tech due to the US Huawei ban.

  • simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This sounds like it’s proprietary. If it is, I doubt anyone will adopt it.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you live in the west then you’re using US based tech and the NSA absolutely has access to all your data.

          edit: LMFAO @ dufuses downvoting. US even spies on European leaders, anybody who thinks their data isn’t mirrored on a NSA server is dumb beyond belief.

          • morningrise@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why are you screeching about the NSA in your own thread about a Chinese built technology?

            How about instead of deflecting to the NSA, you post some merits of China and how they handle surveillance so that trust can be earned.

            I’ll wait.

    • DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Companies based in China can, in fact, develop real technology. The US engages in more espionage thsn anyone, but that doesnt mean US companies can’t develop real tech.

      There are real people and real innovations being made in China and it’s so wrong to just summarily dismiss them because they happen to live in a world power that does what all world powers do.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So weird how people living under western regimes are more concerned about Chinese state control and monitoring than their own. If you live in a western country then your concern is that any western piece of technology is controlled and monitored by the NSA. But that’s just too complex an idea for you to wrap your head around I guess. Screeching China bad is your peak intellectual ability clearly.

      • s20@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, I care about Five (Seven, Nine) Eyes every bit as much as I care about China, I assure you. But in a thread about a Chinese company’s new tech, it would be a bit weird to complain about NSA data mining. Kinda off topic, if you see what I mean.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only thing weird here is bringing up non sequiturs about see see pee spying in a thread about new wireless tech, if you see what I mean.

          • s20@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I do. I’m with you on that. But it makes marginally more sense that bringing up the NSA would.

              • s20@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well, it doesn’t really, except that you mentioned the US trade ban, which brings the reason for the US trade ban into the topic at least tangentially.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I mentioned trade ban in the context of this new technology not being available in US, jumping from that to the eViL SeE SEe PeE is spying on me is quite the leap there.

        • ink@r.nf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          great retort there bud. you sure showed him.

          seriously go back to reddit if all you got is childish insults.

          • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ll politely hijack this thread to ask: What’s wrong with lemm.ee? In all seriousnes.

            I came to lemmy after the other site fiasco and found lemm.ee to be the most stable, fastest and also not defederated site at the moment for me. So i’m genuinely interested if it grew bad rep nowadays or something? Thank you.

            • ATQ@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              There’s nothing wrong with it. The user you’re replying to is the only thing worse than a paid shill. An unpaid shill. Check out their post history and their identical alt accounts on other instances. Fully half the time of you see incredibly stupid shit anywhere on Lemmy… it’s them.

                • ATQ@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If you’re to much of a little bitch to just accept the community note about what you really are then you’ll never rise up and claim the means of production. 😂🤣😂

        • frippa@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If it’s western it’s a country but if it’s Chinese/not western allinged it’s a regime?

          • chaogomu@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Generally, dictatorships are called regimes. Thus, China certainly qualifies as a regime.

            Hell, the actual dictionary definition is as follows;

            Regime, noun;

            A government, especially an oppressive or undemocratic one.

      • ExFed@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why is that weird? Western governments are generally bound by constitutional agreements to not utilize that information against their citizens. That’s not to say they don’t do shady stuff with that information, but getting “disappeared” is more the butt of a Hillary Clinton joke than it is an actual reality for Western citizens … unless you’ve really REALLY pissed off Hillary Clinton.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You should really read up on the revelations that we have from Snowden if you believe all that. Meanwhile, you should let people like Manning and Assange know about not having to worry that you’ll be disappeared and tortured if you say something your regime doesn’t like.