I know not every superhero story is the same, but I feel like recent superhero media has moved away from showing heroes actually saving people. Even vigilantes like Batman and Daredevil rescue civilians—they’re not just crime fighters. Superheroes may not be realistic, but they’ve always prioritized saving lives.
That’s one reason I like The Flash on the CW—it balanced both saving people and crime fighting, even if the crime-fighting usually came first. Superman & Lois does this even better. Almost every episode shows Superman stopping disasters or accidents, not just punching villains.
Superheroes aren’t just super-powered cops, soldiers, or secret agents. They should also be part-time super-firefighters. Shows like 9-1-1 and Chicago Fire make me wish we had more of those rescue scenes—but with superheroes. Not every episode has to be about saving the whole city.
You should read Parahumans:Worm by Wildbow. The best superhero story I have ever read, and it’s completely free! :)
The variety and use cases for all the different powers are especially interesting.
I recommend two good videos about superhero movies.
1 - Defenders of the Status Quo
2 - The people vs Clark Kent
The X-Men were never about saving people.
The very first issues of Batman was his origin story, him fighting the Joker and Catwomen.
Which is a pity, because they do in the comics. Kitty and Nightcrawler are especially good at saving trapped people.
Sure the comics would have parts that were saving people but that was never the primary focus of the comics at.
The first run, issue#1 to issue 93 the comics were all about the individual mutants and their team work to over come the brother hood of evil mutants, lead by Magneto.
After issue 93 the brilliance of Chris Claremont’s X-Men began and the focus were the ongoing character stories and the collective effort of the team to over come the other hood of evil mutants and a number of other bad guys.
Um, ok. And, the main focus of the Bible isn’t gardening, either.
The primary focus isn’t saving people, because that would get old really fast. Is there even a comic where the primary focus is saving people, all the time? What good would saving people do if you didn’t also stop the thing causing the disaster? (Because it is almost always not a natural disaster in comics.)
Talk to the OP man… it is his shower thought.
No. It was you who said the X-Men were never about saving people. I said yes they did. Then you seemed to argue that because the main focus of the X-Men comics isn’t specifically saving people, they are not focused on that in the slightest.
I agree they almost never talked about it in what I read of the original run, but that was the 60s. I’ve read plenty of X-Men comics (after the 70s reboot) where they arrive on scene and start saving people THEN focus on the bad guy.
I’m just trying to say that they do save people. Yes, it’s not the main focus of the comic, but why would it be?
Villains sell toys and merch. You can’t make an action figure of the public
“Not with that attitude, you can’t!” -Lego
I’ve always felt that superhero stories reduce problems to something that can be solved through violence and, for that reason, dont really like them. After a while, the plots all seem the same, too.
Jessica Jones season 1 was good in this regard. A problem and a villain that can’t easily be handled by just throwing punches.
The Watchmen is another good one that has less focus on just punching bad guys.
Completely agree that it is problematic that when your basic story is about super strong individuals, then the only story you will write is about problems that can be solved with violence. No one wants to watch a movie of the Hulk doing shifts to rotate a turbine to generate clean electricity.
I did enjoy Jessica, so yeah, there are a few bright spots in the genre. The last but one Joker movie was worth watching too, but… so many Batman movies that seem kind of the same.
There is a reason that I have fallen asleep during the extended 3rd act fight scene in every single god damn marvel movie since Mark Ruffalo became the Hulk.
They all turn into the same movie, with the same fight. And these super long fights all seem to be surprisingly light on showing any of the actual real world impacts of such violence. Nobody ever gets seriously hurt unless the plot needs more sacrifice. But even when they do, the injuries mostly happen off camera and the blood never flows or spurts, it just instantly appears as makeup. It’s really giving people a deep rooted and totally unfounded sense that violence both solves every problem (it doesn’t) and does so bloodlessly (it doesn’t). At least Batman knows he’s not a hero.
But really, the DC universe isn’t much better. Think about how shocking a little bit of blood at the beginning of the new Superman movie was, before they basically destroy metropolis (which was rather expected and mundane). And then they only show the tiny fraction of people personally saved by Superman, not the countless mangled corpses buried under rubble. This may be why the public has trouble confronting the realities of war and violence.
I think that’s why I really like Invincible. I know it’s not live action superheroes, but I think it does a good job of showing how much destruction and devastation these superhero fights cause. I’m not big on Marvel or DC, but I do have a soft spot for Batman.
Don’t even get me started on ridiculous ones; like Spider man becoming a literally a spider, then felt an instinct to come up to the Spider Queen offering himself to be eaten, then the Spider Queen’s stomach burst open only for a new and shiny Peter Parker/Spiderman come out alive as if he had never become a spider. Then, there is Batman becoming addicted to drugs and telling Alfred to lock him up in the Batcave for weeks to detox.
This is why I generally only read critically acclaimed plot lines and stories than having a general comic interests.
Nearly all stories told are reflective of the propaganda culture of the era. Justifying the cult of billionaire exceptionalism has been the theme for a long time.
Yes! I see it in horror movies most clearly, a mirror to our fears, at least after the fact.
At least Batman and iron man fit the description. What about the others then? I can’t think of many superheroes who happen to be wealthy.
If they’re not wealthy it’s usually individuals that are in some way special and exceptional because they have a power by birth, accident or because of a rare doohickey.
Hmm. So that’s where the exceptionalism argument comes from. Kinda makes sense too, since you have to be exceptional to have exceptional powers. Can’t really make a movie about usual people having exceptional powers, now can you. Like, the whole point of the movie is to look at the life of someone who has strange powers, and getting to that point has to be somehow really weird.
Extraordinary is a sitcom where everyone has a power. I really liked it
Oh thanks. Now the following two weeks of my life will be consumed by binging a new TV series. Better start canceling those appointments and then switch my phone off.
Enjoy, i still need to watch season 2
Funny. Now you got me thinking. In real life, I wouldn’t be rooting for an eccentric Billionaire who thinks he’s a superhero, but when I compare the guy with no super powers to Mr. “I can pretty much do whatever I want and I’m practically indestructible” he feels like an underdog and a whole lot cooler.
Have you watched Thunderbolts and the new Superman? They do actually rescue people (Superman way more).
I was thinking in the theater while watching Thunderbolts: “Huh, a scene where the heroes are rescuing people? I haven’t seen that in a long time.”
Superman even saved a squirrel. 🤩
In project management, we call it “scope creep.” Day one, the job is to use your newfound powers for good. Maybe stop a mugging. Day two, catch a bad guy. Day 3, try to balance life and your secret identity while foiling a bank heist. Day 200, you’re negotiating with an interdimensional cosmic deity for the survival of the Universe by demonstrating feats of strength and fortitude.
THIS, EXACTLY THIS.
I find it strange to call today’s supers “heroes” when the least they do is help others. They look more like guys with superpowers beating each other up, more like Japanese Shonen than anything else (mind you, I like Shonen, but there’s a limit).
That’s why I love that in The Batman (2022) the climax is seeing Batman saving civilians, the same with James Gunn’s Superman.
I WANT TO SEE MORE SUPERHEROES BEING HEROIC, DAMN IT.
I recently watched that Superman movie and liked it. I couldn’t figure out exactly why, but I think it is because he’s helping others.
I was a bit hesitant prior because of MCU fatigue, but I’m glad I watched it. MCU ended for me at whenever Thanos was truly defeated. I can’t even remember the movie.
*Shonen. That is all.
Isn’t it shounen?
It’s 少年. How you want to transliterate that into our alphabet is open to interpretation.
It’s both, and also shōnen, it’s got several recognized romanizations
The correct transliteration of the Japanese word would be shounen, but as an English loanword both are in use.
Ahhh, I see
Fair. Done.
What about villains then? Are they still all about bank heists and murdering everyone in the city, or have they shifted to hunting superheroes now? I’m asking because I don’t watch those movies.
There’s now story points about villains created by the superheroes who’s entire mission is to kill the superheroes in revenge.
Oh wow. The whole superhero genre is really evolving in a strange direction.
If you want to look it up, check out e.g. Baron Zemo or Ultron.
OK so these characters have been around for ages, but it seems that the modern iterations emphasize a very different side of them.
Superman and Lois.
Almost every episode has a scene where he flies off to help people across the globe.
I guess that’s why people like spiderman most? His constant struggle with the villain because he need to juggle between beating villain and saving civilians. If he just went anti-hero he’s pretty much formidable.
I just hate the trend that people want to make villains more generic evil. like how much shit ultraman got for the prescreening when he hits krypto thats actively fighting him. HES A VILLAIN, HES NOT SUPPOSED TO BE GOOD.
I like how Invincible addresses this. He tries to save people but it always ends disastrously because normal people break really easily when handled by someone with super strength and speed. His best bet is to take out the villain that is the source of danger.
Invincible has some of that. Going out of his way to save people at the cost of his personal life. Lots of fighting and gore ofc, but still seems a lot more heroic than a lot of Marvel heroes atp.
He also reflects on the people he couldn’t save or that the hurt while trying to do good.
