• foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    5 months ago

    Linus from LTT asks Linus if he’d ever heard of software developers being terminated based on how many lines of code they’d written .

    Linus Torvalds responds “Anyone who thinks that’s a valid metric is too stupid to work at a tech company…”

    It’s clear Torvalds doesn’t know who this is about when questioned.

    Linus hints to him it’s about Musk.

    “Apparently I was spot on [about Elon Musk being such and individual who is too stupid to work at a tech company].”

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m not even a computer guy, but even I can see how just using the number of lines of code as a metric would be an extremely stupid method for determining effectiveness. Quality should ALWAYS rule over Quantity, but billionaires are obsessively into quantity, to an extremely unhealthy degree (it’s a mental illness, OCD, hoarding, etc.), that’s how they become billionaires.

      • teft@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m going to set my terminal width to 1 character. That way my “lines” of code count goes way up.

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s the kind of thinking that a Sociopathic Oligarch could get behind, which is entirely the problem. Gaming and/or hacking the system is preferable to doing things properly. They want to be “disruptive,” even when it’s ill-advised.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Here’s a very simple example.

        What’s 3^3?

        Or,

        Well it’s 3x3x3

        Which is 3+3+3, 3 times.

        Which is 3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3, which is 27.

        Which solution do we prefer?

        3^3 = 27?

        Or

        3+3+3

        +3+3+3

        +3+3+3

        =27?

        Which one uses more lines?