• blitzen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    compatibility issues with some USB cables

    I’d like to hear more about this. I have a theory that as great as USB-C is for consistency, the fact that it shares a connector with Thunderbolt (to say nothing about the different versions of Thunderbolt) introduces a level of uncertainly when looking at a USB-C connector.

    • it can be a “charge-only” cable (USB 2.0)
    • it can charge slowly, or quickly
    • it can be a USB-C cable
    • it can be Thunderbolt 3 / USB 4.0
    • it can be active, or passive
    • it can be Thunderbolt 4
    • it can be Thunderbolt 5

    I’m certainly not trying to discount your experience. I’m sure you ran into significant problems. But in general I continue to believe that the general public may not have the right “flavor” of USB-C cable to do what they are trying to do in a given situation.

    • auzy1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s nothing to do with the standard I believe

      The same cables and adapters all worked when I used them on my nuc for the same devices, and they wouldn’t even work with my mouse on the Mac studio.

      My suspicion is that the shell of the case is a bit thick (as the port is recessed behind it), so some cables just failed to touch fully. As, some cables felt more snug and clicked into the port better

      For the cost of the computer, it damned sure shouldn’t have that issue

      Even worse, for the price of the computer, the power button should be on front, not buried on the back. That’s overcomplicating things for the sake of doing so

      • blitzen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Reminds me of the original iPhone and the 3.5mm audio jack that was too “deep” for normal headphones.