R F Kuang, Xiran Jay Zhao and Neil Gaiman were ruled ineligible for the 2023 Hugo Awards in 2023 despite receiving enough nominations.

  • bean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    10 months ago

    Writing on Facebook, Gaiman said: “Until now, one of the things that’s always been refreshing about the Hugos has been the transparency and clarity of the process… This is obfuscatory, and without some clarity it means that whatever has gone wrong here is unfixable, or may be unfixable in ways that don’t damage the respect the Hugos have earned over the last 70 years.

      • stellargmite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        All three authors have criticised the CCP in the past. The awards were held in Chengdu, land ot pandas , spicy food , and snowflake leadership. Two of the authors are from international Chinese diaspora . The snowflakes running the country are incredibly sensitive to what ethnic han Chinese outside China - especially in public spheres - say about them. They threw Gaiman in for good measure ( atleast theyre consistent which is kind of surprising). This is just another small measure of softpower being exerted. Any author with reliance on that market is either self censoring or prepared to not have access to it. So clearly its what Hugo did in order to leave in one piece. Mustve been some interesting conversations go on.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      What would you explicate it with, though? an explication of sorts? something else?

        • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sorry, let me rephrase that and see if it’s more easily parsed:

          What is it you think is going on here, and how does your explanation explain these three authors’ situation?

            • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              35
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Ah. If that’s the case, you might want to work on your own phrasing. There’s a strong implication in your initial statement that you have a hypothesis, but you wanted to be coy with it, so I attempted to draw you out. I was hoping it was something interesting.

  • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t like Neil Gaiman, I find his writing a bit repetitive and his personality is a little grating. But are these other two authors any good? I’m always looking for new science fiction authors to get into, and quite liked Cixin Liu if these have been translated from Mandarin.

    • Mandarbmax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I really like Xiran. Kinda smacks you over the head with the message of the book but really fun to read with a great setting and twists.

    • SmolSweetBean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve read all of R.F. Kuang’s books and they are all in my top 10 favorite books ever. Check out The Poppy War series.

    • thesmokingman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve tried a couple of things from R F Kuang. If you like super generic fantasy tropes with an East Asian feel, you’ll probably enjoy their stuff. I haven’t finished any full series because there just wasn’t anything to hook me. I think major authors like Raymond Feist and Terry Brookes also suffer from the generic argument albeit with a European setting so YMMV.