• NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Peaceful protests are by definition useless and only Americans think it works.

    Hell no? Nonviolence—properly planned, properly utilized nonviolence in the appropriate conditions—does work. The classic (good) examples here are Gandhi and MLK, but they’re are far from the only ones. What doesn’t work is American style cargo cult “protests” that reproduce the appearance of protest without having an actual theory of victory. This article does a great job explaining this.

    • Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      MLK achieved the lame duck of the 64 civil rights act, the 68 one with actual rights in it came after every city in the US rioted for 9 days straight.

    • black0ut@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      2 examples that only worked thanks to being the alternative to other violent movements. Gandhi in particular also got a lot of people killed in his “peaceful” crusade, and did nothing about it.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I mean diversity of tactics is important; in practice many successful movements are going to have violent and peaceful wings (or one wing that does both, e.g. the US labor movement), both of which meaningfully contribute to the end result. That doesn’t mean the peaceful wing is useless or toothless; peaceful movements have options for escalation up to and including a general strike.