• auntieclokwise@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    There’s Musk in the Epstein files, for sure. But you know what I love above the Roadster? The people buying the flying versions are going to be quite wealthy. The flying versions are likely to experience RUDs and malfunctions, much like Musk’s rockets (see the recent Thunderf00t video). So, Musk may have inadvertently made us a way to get rid of rich people.

    • possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Have you seen the photos of the nitrogen tanks and the underside of the vehicle? The flying version is a 1 of 1, nobody will ever drive one because it’s an investment grift.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Don’t talk about mechahitler like that, he just wants to do a little fascism - what’s wrong with that?

    /s

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    I still have no idea what flying car the Nazi made and I don’t care. I see it posted about every five minutes though.

    • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not a flying car. It’s some dumb bullshit. That’s all we need to know. We should be focusing on protecting the environment and slowing climate change, but noooooo we gotta let the pedo class waste money and resources on their dumb hobbies.

        • fuckemiquit@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I think they’re so excited cause it’s the first time something they unveiled (albeit, useless) didn’t blowup or fail on a showcase. Big win for Tesla! The curtain didn’t reveal the Wizard of Oz this time!

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Everybody who’s rich is in the Epstein files (that’s why bOtH pArTiEs won’t release it).

    Nobody who’s poor is in the Epstein files.

  • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Now, was he actually in the Epstein files, or did he just desperately want to be? I remeber him asking for an invite to the “wildest parties,” but I don’t remember if anyone actually liked him enough to let him be there.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Being “in the Epstein files” doesn’t mean “was on the Island” or “had sex with children”. It means their name was mentioned in the files. Often that’s because they exchanged emails with Epstein. But, there are people who are “in the Epstein files” because their names were mentioned in an email. There are a few unfortunate people who were “in the Epstein files” because they were mentioned in passing, something like “did you see X’s new comedy special?” or “I liked the new book by Y”.

      In his case, he was in the Epstein files because he sent emails to Epstein, essentially begging for an invite to a party.

      • teslekova@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The funniest one for me as an Australian was Kevin Rudd, former PM. From everything there, it seems Epstein wanted to gain influence by donating to an NGO run by Rudd, and kept inviting him to stuff, and Rudd kept declining. Eventually he made an unsolicited donation and it got handed back.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          23 hours ago

          It’s strange how sometimes, rarely, “being in the Epstein files” can actually prove your good character.

          • lemdeggity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Norman Finkelstein is a good example. Some guy kept copying him in to emails with Epstein which he ignored. Eventually he quoted the testimony of one of Epstein’s victims and essentially said he would throttle Epstein to death if she was his own daughter.

    • lauha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      All that info was in Epstein files so he definitely is there. Whether he touched kids, we don’t know but what we know is that he is so pathetic that not even pedos wanted him in.

    • teslekova@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      He was invited at least once, according to the emails exchanged between him and Epstein in the Epstein Files.

  • lemdeggity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    All kinds of shit is in the Epstein files. Most of it is completely mundane. Are there any real allegations against Musk?

    • Techno-rat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      he really wanted to go fuck kids on the island but got refused several times for being too dorky and unfun. So yes and no. His social radioactivity might have been his only save from indictment this one time even tho he REALLY wanted to do it.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      My dude he is in the files literally begging to go to one of Epstein’s ‘crazy parties’ - do you really think a man with that much power and influence doesn’t know exactly what he’s asking for?

      • lemdeggity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Fully aware of that. I don’t disagree Musk’s a piece of shit. The whole “appears in the Epstein files x times” phrasing just annoys me because it’s meaningless. There is enough disgusting content in the files already which hasn’t been investigated without needing to resort to this sort of hysteria.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          hysteria

          It isn’t hysteria it’s accurately pointing out that no stunt on earth is capable of distracting away from the Epstein files. Not the war in Iran, not flipping a car - absolutely nothing.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Are you in there? We don’t really need proof to have reasonable suspicions that a proud Nazi who is friends with pedophiles is also a pedophile. In fact even if it were somehow proven that he’s not, there’s still mountains of facts about his general evilness. So what is your point exactly?

    • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      ONE CHILD raped is enough to make a kerfuffle about the files. I’ll put you in the same box as these evil fucks. If Musk supports a pedo, he enables them, he is them.

      Wild that someone would be so pedantic about the fucking EPSTEIN FILES. Lemdeggity is either a bot or fascist.

      • lemdeggity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        This sort of nonsense achieves nothing but making the left look stupid. Have you actually looked at any of the Epstein files that have been released? There are entire articles and slide decks that are completely irrelevant to any illegal activity. You can literally look up “ghostbusters” and get 12 results. “Bucket” has 663 results. What does that tell you? Absolutely nothing.

        Musk is a piece of shit but this post is just low quality engagement bait. Use your brain.