A spokesperson for the Russian government clarified that it has rejected requests to interview Vladimir Putin from reputable media outlets

The Kremlin’s first public response to Tucker Carlson’s announcement that he’s landed an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin was to fact-check the former Fox News host.

On Wednesday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov confirmed that Carlson had indeed interviewed Putin, but took issue with Carlson’s claim that “not a single Western journalist has bothered” to interview Russia’s president throughout the nation’s war with Ukraine, which has raged for more than two years.

Putin’s refusal to sit down with most Western media outlets likely has less to do with accusations of bias so much as an unwillingness to be subjected to legitimate scrutiny of his government. Russia has been accused of committing atrocities and war crimes in its offensive against Ukraine, including the unlawful executions of civilians. Putin’s government is also infamous for its frequent detainment of political rivals and critics, as well as the cloud of mysterious deaths and poisonings of those in his orbit.

Whether Carlson will question Putin on any of these matters remains to be seen. The former Fox News host’s history of granting softball interviews to controversial influencers, political figures, and authoritarian leaders, indicates this is unlikely. Given everything we know about Putin’s propaganda machine, it’s clear that in Carlson, the Russian government sees a safe opportunity to broadcast its carefully crafted messaging to American viewers.

  • pezhore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Why can’t they be both? (Gif of taco bell family goes here)

    Edit: woof, sorry all, lesson learned with referring to the Taco Bell gif as “Latinx”. Fixed hopefully?

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Latinx is not a term used by basically anyone of latin ethnicity. Stop trying to make it happen.

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Imo (and my opinion probably doesn’t matter as a white man), it’s actually more bigoted to ignore the gendered-nature of Spanish and force English language rules onto another culture.

        • neoman4426@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Or at least if they’re going to insist anyway go with something like latinae that vaguely follows grammatical rules and is able to be pronounced

          • BossDj@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            The Latino group I met (college students) said they go with Latinx only because it’s the movement that actually gained traction in recognizing the bias.

            Now the more important piece they said is how extremely patriarchal Latino communities already are, and it’s what they know and we’re raised with, so of course “the majority” think it’s stupid because the majority are older and Christian and very set in their ways. Similar to so many women stuck in shit marriages because they were raised to think that’s their lot in life.

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              It’s a fascinating intersectionality issue. The Latino students you met are definitely right about bias and the patriarchy issues. But, it would be incredibly patronizing for someone who isn’t Latino to correct someone who is and say they should be using Latinx instead.

              I think we have to recognize that unless we’re Latino, this isn’t our battle. We can help out of course, but it isn’t our place to tell them what term they should use. That’s something Latinos have to decide on their own, and we use what they ask us to use.

              • BossDj@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Totally agree! Well said.

                I’m just scared that the message “they don’t want it. Stop trying” empowers especially white racist people and disenfranchises the youth who are fighting for the change over time (I don’t actually know our research how large this movement is. Obviously I still used Latino in my own post). Big right wing media gets their message out that progressives are reverse racist, but the more accurate message you said I think isn’t as pervasive, and both sides need to hear it. Especially among minorities who aren’t getting representation or getting their voices heard.

                • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Other thing is, I can’t pretend like I’m a cultural expert. When they say it’s patriarchal, they might be thinking of completely different examples than me. And the ones I’m thinking of might be benign or have a cultural significance that outweighs anything else. It’s better for me to keep my mouth shut on specifics, and let them know I support them and I’ll respect whatever terminology they prefer.

          • MagicShel@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            In my head, I pronounce it “luhTinks”. I don’t know what is intended and I’m pretty sure that’s not it, but that only makes it more fun to think of it that way.

            • neoman4426@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I think the idea is intended as something like “Latin. X.”, which isn’t really any better, sounds like the monster from a racist 50s B movie or something. La-tinx is where my mind always defaults to too though

        • mhague@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Latinx comes from students from Columbia or something. It’s a Latin American term.

      • Restaldt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        And the even dumber part is we already had a way to express the same info with just saying latin

      • mhague@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Latinx was invented by latin ethnicities. Just listen to people when they say what they want to be called, it probably isn’t Latinx but it might be.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I do listen to people, and most fucking hate latinx. Maybe you are the one with your ears plugged… One latino person does not speak for all latinos. That’s not how race works. That’s not how it has ever worked.

          • mhague@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Exactly, one person doesn’t speak for everyone. Ignore people who say “latins don’t like Latinx” because they don’t speak for everyone and it’s a Latin American term anyways. Listen to those around you and you’ll know what to use. We’re in agreement.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Uhhhhh no you are literally not even listening to your own advice…

              MOST PEOPLE DO NOT LIKE IT. That is SPECIFICALLY NOT ignoring their opinion on the matter, you brainless worm. Most Mexicans and Spanish people do not like it. Most do not like it. Start fucking LISTENING.

              • mhague@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                You think because I added more context behind the word Latinx that I’m advocating for it to be the general term for a group of people, right? I was trying to figure out how you got so confused and angry.

                Either that or you feel that by not deferring to your expertise on Mexicans and Spanish people, it’s equivalent to not listening to others, which makes me a hypocrite because I’m saying to listen to individuals.

                • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  When the vast majority don’t like something you’re pushing on them, it makes you a dick. Stop being a dick.

    • Orbituary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Latino here. 93% of us polled either dislike, find stupid, or are not interested in the English language usage of the word “Latinx.” It’s use is a misunderstanding of the basic functional parts of the Spanish language.

      Its usage presumes some sort of malicious gendering of words, however most languages, and in particular, Latin based languages like Spanish, French, Italian, and Portuguese, all use gendering.

      • eran_morad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Wait — you don’t like to be told by a bunch of entitled assholes what to call yourself?

      • Jaderick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I thought Latinx was part of a movement that would explicitly remove gendering of words from languages like Spanish, French, and German. I thinks it’s by design, but unpopular

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Well if they’re going to do it by replacing everything with x, they’re going to have to talk to Elon…

      • LennethAegis@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve also heard “Latine” used, how is that one doing in hispanic culture? I’m hispanic myself, but have lived mostly separate from the culture, so I’m unfamiliar if the terms get used or not.

        • Orbituary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s a different thing altogether. Its origins are in Spanish and attempt to do the same as “they/them” and is a attempt to be inclusive of gender fluidity.

          Latinx is an entitled American white invention.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I love how responses to this change from “ask someone from Latin America” to “you dont know as much as I do” when you don’t back them up.

        They go from revering you until you appear, to discounting your experience when you do.

    • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Being manipulative requires the intelligence to know how and when to manipulate others.

      Being manipulated requires low intelligence and emotional fragility.

      Tucker was always going to be compromised in that regard.