• 5 Posts
  • 1.2K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 25th, 2023

help-circle
  • My concern is in regards to AI… I think many are relying more and more on it. Making such content a waste of my time in this perspective.

    Another way to frame this is “I don’t have anything new to add to what AI would write on the subject”.

    Don’t you? Then why are you thinking about writing a blog? Even if it’s just a documentation of your projects, it’ll be your perspective. AI can’t write that, so people who want to read your blog aren’t going to get it from AI.



  • You’d be astounded at the places you’ll run into the idea that foreskin is gross. I was at a burlesque show - very left-leaning crowd - and the MC asked for “what ruins a bedroom experience for you”. “Uncut cock” was like the second answer and everyone hooted and hollered (though props to the MC, they managed to seem real uncomfortable while playing it off well). I’ve never had it directed at me thankfully, though I have had some surprise from one or two partner that I’m not cut.

    I’ll say it til the day I die, I owe my mum a debt I can never repay for not letting my dad do that to me. Just one of the multitude of ways she protected me.



  • So then if the bucket is moving in a counter clockwise direction, the “left” wall of the bucket would be the thing acting on the water. Wouldn’t that cause the water to stick to the left wall of the bucket, not the bottom?

    It might help to remember that “left” and “bottom” are different depending on where you’re standing. The water keeps moving in the direction the original force got it moving, but as the bucket traces the circular path, the “left” and “bottom” walls are now in different positions relative to the water. Remember, you don’t see the water sitting peacefully on the “bottom” of the bucket like you would if it were standing at rest; the water is forced in the “bottom left corner” of the bucket while it spins, because the water always being accelerated (by the bucket) tangent to the direction its already moving.

    Also, the bucket is absolutely experiencing the force of the water acting on it - right from the start of the string pulling taut, the water has been pushing on the bucket’s walls (and even before, actually, the whole time the water is in the bucket). But that’s not really relevant.

    I’m not quite sure I get how fictitious anti particles relate to fictitious forces.

    Sorry, I didn’t mean to muddy the water - I was just trying to illustrate why it’s called “fictitious”. It looks and acts like a force (or a particle, in the case of the marble), but it isn’t one because it doesn’t actually exist outside that frame of reference. Centripetal force is the “pull” towards the centre of the circle that is required for circular motion; if you think of the actual motion of swinging a bucket around on a string, you’ll be pulling on the string (if you don’t pull, the bucket flies off in a straight line, along with the water in it). And, if you don’t pull the string, and the bucket and water fly off in a straight line, then the water (and bucket) no longer experience the centrifugal force they got while tracing the circular path.


  • It’s called a fictitious force because there’s not actually a universal phenomenon like gravity or electromagnetism that causes it. When the bucket starts moving, the water is at rest, and the bucket’s motion causes the water to move in a single direction. When the bucket’s vector starts to change, the water’s vector does not. The water is still moving in the original direction, but that direction is now “outwards” from the centre, and the bucket exhibits new motion on the water, changing the direction it’s traveling again. The water is trying to escape the bucket, but keep going in the direction it’s already going (outwards), not towards the centre of the circle the bucket is tracing. The bucket however is in the way, redirecting it along the circular path. Remove the bucket, and the water goes flying off away from the center of the circle.

    Another way to understand a fictitious force is to think of a bunch of marbles in a box, packed tight so all the marbles are touching and none of them can move. Each marble is a particle, push on one and you affect others around it. Now, remove a marble so you have a space, and only one marble can move at a time. And now, reverse your vision - the space left by removing the marble is the particle, an “anti-particle”, and the marbles are free space. Push on the marbles, and the anti-particle moves around like a marble would. It’s not a marble of course, it’s a space, so you could call this “anti-particle” you just created “fictitious”.

    So it’s not that the water in the bucket is accelerating inwards, because it’s not the water maintaining that circular motion at all - it’s the bucket maintaining the circular motion. The water’s “inwards acceleration” that keeps it moving in a circle is actually just the water’s inertia, relative to the motion of the bucket.