• GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sure, but we also have to realize that we live in a country with a two-party system and a winner-take-all electoral college. If you’re not helping your candidate, you’re helping the opponent.

        • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          They’ll never have a chance in a winner-take-all electoral college system.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          You’ll never convince 160 million people to vote 3rd party. So a vote for 3rd party is a vote for the most popular of the 2 candidates.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            Ελληνικά
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            No, a vote 3rd party is a vote against your most tolerable of the two viable candidates.

          • pedalmore@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            The key here is that it’s a vote for the most popular of the 2 candidates based on the votes of who bothered to vote for them specifically, then further butchered via the EC. It’s a smaller, different pool of people that may elect someone that the actual majority prefer less, because part of the actual majority decided to play a different game entirely.