Because its all snake oil thats based on nothing. It will always be 13-18 as this is the area they can get away with - teenagers will be the sacrificial lamb where all the focus will be brought towards children.

But why are teenagers included? Because they have greater ambitions than just children. And every one of these states has their own fascist strategy for totalitarianism.

A ban for children (& teenagers) is a ban to privacy for everyone.

What the hell are you even talking about? This really reads like a troll comment more than anything.

convicted paedophile

He is a convicted rapist not just a “paedophile”. Paedophilia is a mental condition - and we are way past that - so why spread nonsence such as “convicted paedophile” when in fact we’re talking about a sex offender/rapist.

I feel you. To help, there is tools on Lemmy which aid you with trauma or content you find troublesome. Filters are a great way to adjust your feed to rule out stuff just like this; there are also specific blocks you can do such as community blocks ❤️.

Its really such a poor choice of words. Why try to invent new words for the exact same thing? The only thing that comes to mind in this case is strategic manipulation.

Agreed, the reality is that he raped everyone that was available. Children weren’t the sole victim - in the sake of this post, it was a teenager that was the victim which illustrates how wide spread this is.

And that argument is probably ragebait, which that other person has fallen into.

Nothing. One person talks shit, while the other sells a strawman to “prove a point”. Both are shit people.

The government will always find a vendetta against people. In this case they have something to anchor to, basically a historical paper trail used to manipulate you.

It even features a flared base…

Its the same situation where people purposely downgrade their phones to flip phones.

Sometimes simplicity is more convenient and secure. Especially when you don’t need all the gimmicks a modern device has - it is a difference of paying $100 or $1000+

Exactly.

Wearing it like a badge of honour 😎

Stripping child labour protection is essentially stripping workers and human rights away. This may be focused on children but it absolutely isnt - it also mixes in teenagers and adults, and those who support this are egotistical pricks.

Yeah, children are an easy target, but they would also go after teens, young and old adults. Its a problem that concerns everybody.

deleted by creator

Thats the first thing coming to mind

Its the fact that “generations” are used here. It brings in a harmful concept, thats all.

Yes and no, you’d really need to take precautions here (like taking care of exif data). I’d generally not advise this, however, you do you.

Honestly, it does look like a case of bigotry. Its unneeded and literally does no one favours. It is valid to state the concerns.