Edit: Holy shit, this attracted a lot of attention
So this guy is trying to legitimize Epsteins pedophilia? I wonder what it costs to bribe someone to say that? Probably disappointingly little.
Check that guy’s hard drive.
Forget the hard drive, just drop that sucker in some well
naive to think that Epstein was paying the kids
I feel so safe for kids surrounded by good conservative Christians with high morale values thanks to their faith as opposed to fellow atheists who have nothing to stop them from abusing, raping and killing children!
They signal almost day they signal how much their faith make them better people!
PS: Before the shitstorm, of course I don’t assume Christians are bad people by default. It’s just the ones who talk the most about how they have values and anyone who’s not them doesn’t seem to also be the ones who have the least.
If you dont have a god, what stops you from fucking roadkill?
And per new interpretation of god’s will, we are to fuck heretic roadkill.
Thank you for this. It’s a very concise way to point out both the answer to the real question, and how fucked up the asker is showing themselves to be.
Hey, I was planning to eat that. I have no religion, so whats going to stop me.
You can eat it when I’m done with it, now stand back.
I guarantee you this guy’s browser history being made public would put him in prison.
Correct, you are not being provocative. You are just spouting pedophile nonsense.
That persons computer needs to be checked for sure
Damn this tweet must sound really smart to a complete fucking idiot.
greta is 23. alexander the great concquered persia by that age.
I think this is an older thing, but either way, gross.
“Not even being provocative…”
proceeds to throw gallons of fresh, bloody chum
Twitter people love posting incoherent slop, dick in hand. I really hate that so many platforms are based on the hot take model. I try to justify it by saying another probable model might be worse, but it’s not working.
I can sort of see the logic at play here. It’s shaky, mind, and full of holes, but he almost had a coherent thought.
It’s False Equivalency, I’m fully aware, so I get that he’s wrong, just that I can understand why he might think that.
Yeah, wtf? Like I see what that
skeevy guyblatant pedophile predator was trying to say… but just… Euuuuuhhhuuuhhhhh shiversWell even what he was trying to say is completely braindead because Thunberg constantly states how she isn’t asking to make decisions, she’s asking the adults to take it seriously and do something about it.
“Not even being provocative”… Proceeds to justify being a pedo.
Surely this is ragebait
Poe’s Law. If this counts as bait we live in a world we should be setting fire to.
To be fair that’s what we’re doing
At some point, the distinction is without difference.
I mean, I don’t care enough to look it up, but this is pretty realistic regarding the US conservative view so I believe it.
Nuh uh, he said he’s not even being provocative, so it can’t be bait!
That was Greta’s ENTIRE POINT THOUGH! That the younger generation shouldn’t need to be the ones to come up with the policies to fix the shit the older generations did!
It wasn’t sex, it was rape.
Hey, wait a second… They weren’t paid at all!
Yeah…not even paid…
