• dubious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    the simplest solution is to stop having so many babies. population reduction is critical to quality of life.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just moved from an apartment to a house.

    If the apartment had the same floor space and the city actually accommodated my hobbies (I need a large garage to work on cars and finish fixing a boat) then I would’ve gladly stayed.

    However. Apartments above 60m² are rare and expensive, and all garages/industrial sites are unfavorable because you can put another bloc or supermarket in there. The cities became living hubs for corporate workers whose entire lives can be crammed into a 40 meter apartment and their only entertainment is a depression rectangle or a gaming console.

  • TauriWarrior@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    When we lived in an apartment someone set off the fire alarm several times a week, sometimes at 3am which is a shitty way and time to awaken. Never want to live in one again

  • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Now, do the houses in the same density. I’m talking, wall-to-wall, stacked on top of one another in a brick filled with shingles, confusion, and misery, thanks to the lack of any connecting hallways, stairwells, or elevators. /j

  • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unironically houses. If you go for the apartment, The remaining land will still be filled up, just with apartments instead of houses, and you’ll have to deal with 50x more people then you would have with house model.

    One of the main benefits of using houses instead of apartments is avoiding population density.

  • kickeriekuh@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The picture on the left could be even worse. There are areas where people move in and tear all the greenery out of the garden and then either cover everything with paving stones or gravel. Everything around the house! Then there’s also an ugly metal fence or plastic elements in the garden, sometimes you can see fake plants.

    Some humans are so stupid…

  • Zementid@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    If the apartments are no shoe boxes and have lavishly big (garden) balconies I’m all in. The space should be around 100-120 qm each with flexible drywall placement for individual footprints.

    I love living in a walkable city but I envy a friend of mine a little bit, who exits his apartment into a market center with cafes, shops, supermarkets, barber, doctors etc.

  • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    A lot of people in this thread are mistaking the map for the territory. Like yes, obviously neither the development on the right, or the left would actually happen in real life, because why are these people even on the island? What do they eat? What do they drink? Where do they work? The sole statement of the graphic is that dense developments have a reduced impact on nature compared to sparse developments. Discussing the logistics would exceed what can be conveyed by such a format.

  • 5in1k@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve lived in an apartment and I just can’t do it. I hated every day in it.

  • Jonah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Put a few more towers there for double or triple the housing and we’re in business.