fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoDreams come truemander.xyzimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1624arrow-down15
arrow-up1619arrow-down1imageDreams come truemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-squareJake Farm@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up48·2 days agoAnd they expect you to do this for free?
minus-squareApathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·1 day agoDo they not have to pay for the privilege? Or is this not referring to academic publishing? (It’s not super clear, but context indicates academic?)
minus-squareJake Farm@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·1 day agoIf it is that makes it even worse. Academic publishers need to be abolished.
minus-squareJake Farm@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoMaybe check the other comments.
minus-squareRolando@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 day agoAnyone who reviews for the major publishers is part of the problem.
minus-squareJake Farm@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 day agoFor profit corporations don’t deserve your volunteer work.
minus-squarephdepressed@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoAnd yet if you aren’t a reviewer it makes your CV look worse.
minus-squareRolando@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·23 hours agoAgreed that you should have some kind of “service” on your CV, but reviewing is pretty low impact. And if you want to review, you can choose something other than the predatory publishers.
minus-squarephdepressed@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 hours agoSuch as? They’re all predatory just to varying degrees.
And they expect you to do this for free?
Do they not have to pay for the privilege? Or is this not referring to academic publishing? (It’s not super clear, but context indicates academic?)
If it is that makes it even worse. Academic publishers need to be abolished.
Nah, they get “Exposure”!
/s
deleted by creator
Maybe check the other comments.
Anyone who reviews for the major publishers is part of the problem.
For profit corporations don’t deserve your volunteer work.
And yet if you aren’t a reviewer it makes your CV look worse.
Agreed that you should have some kind of “service” on your CV, but reviewing is pretty low impact. And if you want to review, you can choose something other than the predatory publishers.
Such as? They’re all predatory just to varying degrees.