Just curious because I don’t see people talk about it a lot.

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    17 here, my grandparents used it before switching 1-2 years ago. Can’t imagine the ads are any better that less people watch it and staticy stations were annoying.

    I myself don’t watch TV that much, mainly YouTube or music. In the last month I’ve watched ~3 episodes of impractical jokers on the family TV, and 8 episodes of South Park on my Steamdeck before bed.

  • spizzat2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The transition from analog to digital really hurt my desire to watch OTA TV (you caught me! I’m not under 25).

    With analog broadcast, any weak signal or interference produced a little bit of static, but you could still see and hear what was being said. With digital, any weak signal means dropped frames and silence or weird glitches. You completely lose what’s happening. Even with a powered antenna, I have frequent issues with weak signal. I could probably try to get a rooftop antenna installed, but there’s no guarantee it would be any better. It’s just easier to find other entertainment at this point.

    • yannic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Ditto. We went from having five channels, one snowy on a bad day, plus a bonus 6th channel when the stars aligned, to two channels at best.

      The broadcasters and regulators took a basic fact about digital signals “We can get a better quality signal with less transmission power” and saw it as a challenge to set up their digital transmitters with the most conservative estimate of minimum power required. I haven’t studied well enough for my amateur radio exam to know if I’m comparing apples to oranges, but I’m still shocked to see descriptions of transmitter power go from 100kW in one case to below 20kW.

    • ch00f@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I hear that. We have an attic yagi aimed directly at Seattle from 10 miles away, and we still get the occasional dropout even on our strongest signals.

      Still when it works, it works really well. We watch Nature and Nova on Sundays, and the wildlife footage looks incredible.

  • Microw@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Linear TV over an antenna? Well that’s only technically free. You’d need to buy a receiving device - that costs money. You need to watch ads - that costs time.

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If you have a TV, you likely already have the receiving device. Antenna can cost, or you can play around with wire length and orientation.

    • ch00f@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Well considering many paid tiers of streaming services also serve ads, I consider it free-er than that.

      Also, most of the hardware is already inside your TV. You just need a $20 antenna.

      • Microw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I have no TV. I watch all my movies and series via a big PC screen which has no TV functionality.

        • ch00f@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Ah. Well if your PC is static, a USB tuner isn’t too much. Plus then you have a built-in DVR.

  • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I don’t care about cable TV. In Hungary nearly all news broadcasts over here are just propaganda machines and spitting out literal garbage content. Also the ads.

    UbO + Internet + torrent goes br

    • observes_depths@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      This (applies everywhere). Besides it’s all aimed at boomers and not at all engaging. People who are internet savvy can easily find better free content.

    • ch00f@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      See this is what I’m talking about. Cable is not the same as over the air. I’m not sure how your cable works in Hungary content/pricing-wise, but I do find it funny that a lot of younger people in this thread are lumping the two together.

    • Luffy879@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Im really glad I moved to germany, aside from all my bad experiences there, the whole place was a shithole from the beginning. I just want to See that place burn

  • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Ads, ads everywhere.

    Besides there, there is also a 4k OTA standard, ATSC 3.0. Most TVs don’t support it yet, but some do. Worth googling before you buy. You can also get something like an silcondust 4k standalone tuner and plug that into your home network instead. You then load its app to watch over the air TV in 4k.

    If you do buy the silicondust tuner, you can go further and get a DVR going. Plenty of free projects that will help you setup and record TV like jellyfin, and many of them will auto-skip the ads too with an application called comskip.

        • Ptsf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Bandwidth is cheaper from the tower since the signal is the “same” for each client and it can then be distributed over a wide area. You send the “DRM” (Just a fancy encryption key) over the network since it’s relatively small and likely unique to each device (probably fingerprinting the device ids to the content invisibily in case of piracy).

          • Kushan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Multicast is a thing, though it doesn’t seem to be widespread. That would make a lot more sense than this weird DRM broadcast system.

            • Ptsf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Multicast still requires more expensive less widespread bandwidth than sending out analog signals ota & shooting off a few packets of encryption information every now and then. US infrastructure has rapidly improved over the past few years, but we’re still a farcry from anything robust and reliable enough to serve the people benefiting from this type of content.

          • Fermion@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Having the receiver phone home would have the benefit of generating more accurate viewership data, where broadcast tv has historically relied on representative cohorts.

  • Simmy@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Kodi + Seren + Real Debris Subscription £2 /month. Every show/Movie you would ever want. No need for VPN services.

    • ch00f@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      For like $150, you can get a Tablo DVR or similar that records what you want to watch, auto skips the ads, and streams it over WiFi to your phone or laptop. Just leave it on for a year and boom: entire season of whatever show is now yours forever for free.

        • ch00f@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Eh. There’s also the serendipity of it. There’s a half dozen shows that we regularly watch that we only know about because they were randomly on TV.

          • rishado@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I think the overlap of tech literacy and nostalgia for a 90s/00s tv feel is quite small. You found your niche though my man, good work.

        • ch00f@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          You don’t, but that only applies to sports or things that you need to watch live.

          • tetris11@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            My mum has a Tivo-like box that allows her to record things and catch up with them later. She still watches all of her series live, so she can gossip with her friends about it the next day. The most useful feature of that setup is that she can pause the show if someone calls her or she needs the toilet, but she wont miss a show that was scheduled for that day

  • flashgnash@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Vaguely aware that’s a thing you can do, but I have no reason to use it as I don’t really watch anything on regular TV anyway

    • ch00f@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Pick up Tablo or HDHomerun. Connect an antenna. Drop it in a closet or wherever you get the best reception. Then just record stuff you like. You can browse from any media streaming box (AppleTV, etc).

      There’s decent content in there and after the upfront cost, it’s free.