• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 day ago

    what a sad, pathetic loser.

    Willing to kill people because he “Stands with” a car brand.

    Hope he gets put away for a very long time.

    • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      He has pent up emotional trauma that he has refused to work through with a therapist like a normal human being.

      Thus he sees inflicting human suffering as a viable alternative to working through those issues. Because that was he can feel better knowing others are worse off.

      That’s the dog. Should it be in the race? Nah. But some cucklefucks just refuse to act like normal human beings. Maybe a therapist isn’t alpha male enough or some shit? But for one reason or another they just refuse to address their mental trauma like normal people.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s about oppression. He feels justified to oppress those he disagrees with because they did it to him (they didn’t but he believes it).

  • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Violence is an intrinsic part of fascism. It is the inevitable consequence of “might makes right”. Be prepared for a lot more violence. Probably on both sides.

    • Chris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Brown shirts are unofficially part of the administration. This is going to get a lot worse if we don’t figure out how to de-escalate

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        if we don’t figure out how to de-escalate

        That’s the crux of the issue. The only way to deescalate against a “might makes right” approach is to match violence with violence. Rolling over and “taking the high road” will just end up with the violent people continuing to be violent because they didn’t have any consequences the last time. “De-escalating” can’t be done by giving the bully your lunch money, because they’ll just be back again tomorrow.

        You at least need to make yourself an unattractive target, so they’re likely to go bother someone else instead. Even if you don’t totally stop the behavior, you at least need to send a strong “if you fuck with me specifically you will have problems” signal. Even if you don’t stop the bully, you at least ensure that you’re not the target.

        That’s a large part of why the Black Panthers got started. People realized that peaceful unarmed protests would get violently busted by the cops. In contrast, peaceful heavily armed protests would have cops politely watching from across the street.

        • Chris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Yeah I agree. I’m just trying to not be accused of “calling for violence” in my public lemmy posts lol

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Were they obstructing the sidewalk? I could see Florida Lawyer making a case from that.

        • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          To traffic? A normal pedestrian is “obstructing” the sidewalk to a car. Vehicles have no right of way there!

        • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          They probably had a permit from the police so the answer is most likely no. Can’t really argue that they’re “obstructing” the sidewalk when you gave them permission to be there. That would hold up on Fox News but not in a courtroom.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      His Nissan SUV identifies as a Tesla…

      /s

      But this guy is a complete idiot, he went in and told employees he “stands with Tesla” and then left.

      So it’s going to be really hard to argue he was there for any other reason than surpress protestors first amendment rights.

      It’s Florida tho, so who knows what will happen

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        he went in and told employees he “stands with Tesla” and then left.

        “Oh fantastic sir! Can we interest you in a new Cybertruck to replace your Nissan?”

        “Ew, gross. no! What I mean by ‘I stand with you’ is that ‘your CEO is hurting people I want hurt’. No way am I driving an EV.”

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    The report states that Dutil got out of the vehicle and then walked into the dealership. An employee told deputies that Dutil told workers there that he “stands with Tesla” and then “walked out.”

    lol

    A statement Dutil made to deputies was redacted from the arrest report.

    That seems pretty unusual for a sherrif’s office.