• SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Good thing this isn’t a country that came about because a bunch of rich white dudes got tired of being taxed and started a revolution.

    • ggppjj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      That possibly reframing “no taxation without representation” a bit but I don’t entirely disagree with the sentiment.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 hours ago

        They thought funding Trump would get them representation. They were wrong. Trump cares about no one but himself.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          he was only ever representing putin, and MSB never the billionaires in the us.

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            So, he could have paid other guys to fight the war and stayed home? Instead of being in the middle of the battles, and going cold and hungry in Valley Forge?

            There’s a lot of bad things you can say about Washington but enough good to at least make him complicated. He chose to limit his own Presidency, the opposite of our wannabe Führer. for one.

            • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Well, his wealth wasn’t exactly liquid, it was mostly tied up in wilderness land.

              Fortunes in those days weren’t in bank accounts, or stocks, or index funds, etc. They tended to be tied up in assets like land, slaves, crops, etc., and cold hard cash/gold, stored in a box somewhere, like under the floor.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        In the most literal sense we have representation, but it sure as hell doesn’t seem like it in practice… :(

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Literal only in the terminological sense. We elect “representatives” but they don’t actually represent us in any meaningful way.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        When elections are fraudulent, its the same as no representation. Besides, pretty soon they’ll be suspending elections altogether. It doesn’t get more “no representation” than that.